FELC vs PJUS

FELC vs PJUS

Which is better, FELC or PJUS?

FELC costs less.

FELC has a lower expense ratio. FELC is less concentrated, with 40.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 41.2%.

Lower Fees: FELCLess Concentrated: FELC

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricFELCPJUS
Expense Ratio0.18%Best0.19%
AUM$8.6B$7M
Dividend Yield0.83%0.00%
Holdings590198
YTD Return+15.12%Best+5.58%
1Y Return+19.31%-
3Y Return (annualized)+22.16%-
Top 10 Weight40.1%Best41.2%
Fund FamilyFidelity Investments (US)PGIM Investments
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap BlendLarge Cap Blend
InceptionNov 20, 2023May 20, 2026

Not shown on this pair: 5Y Return (annualized), Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.

FELC vs PJUS growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

Compare FELC against instead:FELC vs SPYFELC vs QQQFELC vs VOOFELC vs VTIPJUS against:PJUS vs VXUS

FELC vs PJUS Performance

Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Core ETF (FELC) is an ETF from Fidelity Investments (US) and PGIM Jennison U.S. Core Equity ETF (PJUS) is an ETF from PGIM Investments. Year to date, FELC is up 15.12% versus a gain of 5.58% for PJUS.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

FELC charges 0.18% per year while PJUS charges 0.19%. On a $10,000 position that is $18 vs $19 annually, a gap of $1 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FELC currently yields 0.83% against 0.00% for PJUS.

Holdings Overlap

FELC already in PJUS63.6%
PJUS already in FELC79.8%

63.6% of FELC's money is in holdings PJUS also owns. 79.8% of PJUS's money is in holdings FELC also owns.

Most of PJUS is already inside FELC. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.

62 positions in common, counted across the 300 positions we hold weights for in FELC and 97 in PJUS, against full books of 590 and 198.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 35 positions for PJUS that do not appear in our book for FELC (19.8% of the fund), and 160 for FELC that do not appear in PJUS (35.9%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in FELCWeight in PJUSDifference
NVDANvidia Corp8.93%7.60%1.33%
AAPLApple, Inc7.73%6.74%0.99%
MSFTMicrosoft Corp5.08%5.36%0.28%
GOOGLAlphabet Inc3.35%6.87%3.52%
AMZNAmazon.Com Inc3.83%3.90%0.07%
AVGOBroadcom Inc2.80%2.31%0.49%
MUMicron Technology, Inc.2.04%2.48%0.44%
METAMeta Platforms Inc2.38%1.75%0.63%
LLYEli Lilly & Co.1.74%1.76%0.02%
JPMJpmorgan Chase1.71%1.72%0.01%

79.8% of PJUS is already inside FELC.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

FELCPJUS

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, FELC or PJUS?

FELC has an expense ratio of 0.18% while PJUS charges 0.19%. FELC is the cheaper option, by $1 a year on a $10,000 investment.

What is the holdings overlap between FELC and PJUS?

79.8% of PJUS's money is in holdings FELC also owns. 79.8% of PJUS's is in holdings FELC also owns. They hold 62 positions in common, counted across the 300 positions we hold weights for in FELC and 97 in PJUS.

Which pays a higher dividend, FELC or PJUS?

FELC yields 0.83% while PJUS yields 0.00%, so FELC currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is PJUS better than FELC?

FELC has a lower expense ratio. FELC is less concentrated, with 40.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 41.2%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.