FELV vs TALV

FELV vs TALV

Which is better, FELV or TALV?

FELV costs less.

FELV has a lower expense ratio. FELV is less concentrated, with 30.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 33.5%.

Lower Fees: FELVLess Concentrated: FELV

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricFELVTALV
Expense Ratio0.18%Best0.49%
AUM$3.4B$178M
Dividend Yield1.43%0.73%
Holdings36470
YTD Return+22.64%Best+14.25%
1Y Return+29.22%-
3Y Return (annualized)+21.98%-
Top 10 Weight30.1%Best33.5%
Fund FamilyFidelity Investments (US)Transamerica
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap ValueLarge Cap Value
InceptionNov 20, 2023Dec 15, 2025

Not shown on this pair: 5Y Return (annualized), Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.

FELV vs TALV growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

Compare FELV against instead:FELV vs SPYFELV vs QQQFELV vs VOOFELV vs VTITALV against:TALV vs VXUS

FELV vs TALV Performance

Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Value ETF (FELV) is an ETF from Fidelity Investments (US) and Transamerica Large Value Active ETF (TALV) is an ETF from Transamerica. Year to date, FELV is up 22.64% versus a gain of 14.25% for TALV.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

FELV charges 0.18% per year while TALV charges 0.49%. On a $10,000 position that is $18 vs $49 annually, a gap of $31 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FELV currently yields 1.43% against 0.73% for TALV.

Holdings Overlap

FELV already in TALV43.7%
TALV already in FELV79.1%

43.7% of FELV's money is in holdings TALV also owns. 79.1% of TALV's money is in holdings FELV also owns.

Most of TALV is already inside FELV. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.

47 positions in common, counted across the 389 positions we hold weights for in FELV and 68 in TALV, against full books of 364 and 70.

What only one of them owns

Measured across the 389 and 68 positions we hold weights for.

FELV holds 288 positions TALV does not, 55.2% of the fund.

Largest: INTC 1.44%, JNJ 1.29%, CVX 1.21%, PFE 0.93%, T 0.86%

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in FELVWeight in TALVDifference
AAPLApple, Inc6.50%5.22%1.28%
AMZNAmazon.Com Inc6.20%5.51%0.69%
MSFTMicrosoft Corp4.67%5.28%0.61%
JPMJpmorgan Chase2.62%4.00%1.38%
XOMExxonmobil Corp.1.91%2.97%1.06%
BRK.BBerkshire Hathaway Inc Brk/B Us Equity3.04%1.63%1.41%
CSCOCisco Systems Inc. - Ordinary Shares1.25%2.16%0.91%
ABBVAbbvie Inc.0.92%2.35%1.43%
BACBank of America Corp.: Financials1.13%1.88%0.75%
MRKMerck & Company Inc0.97%2.00%1.03%

79.1% of TALV is already inside FELV.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

FELVTALV

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, FELV or TALV?

FELV has an expense ratio of 0.18% while TALV charges 0.49%. FELV is the cheaper option, by $31 a year on a $10,000 investment.

What is the holdings overlap between FELV and TALV?

79.1% of TALV's money is in holdings FELV also owns. 79.1% of TALV's is in holdings FELV also owns. They hold 47 positions in common, counted across the 389 positions we hold weights for in FELV and 68 in TALV.

Which pays a higher dividend, FELV or TALV?

FELV yields 1.43% while TALV yields 0.73%, so FELV currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is TALV better than FELV?

FELV has a lower expense ratio. FELV is less concentrated, with 30.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 33.5%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.