FEMV vs VTI

FEMV vs VTI

Which is better, FEMV or VTI?

Mid Cap Value against Large Cap Blend.

VTI has a lower expense ratio. FEMV is less concentrated, with 10.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 33.5%.

Lower Fees: VTILess Concentrated: FEMV

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricFEMVVTI
Expense Ratio0.23%0.03%Best
AUM$7M$689.2B
Dividend Yield0.61%1.06%
Holdings2623,524
YTD Return+7.60%+13.02%Best
1Y Return-+16.63%
3Y Return (annualized)-+21.97%
5Y Return (annualized)-+11.99%
Top 10 Weight10.1%Best33.5%
Fund FamilyFidelity Investments (US)Vanguard (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleMid Cap ValueLarge Cap Blend
InceptionApr 28, 2026May 24, 2001

Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.

FEMV vs VTI growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

FEMV vs VTI Performance

Fidelity Enhanced Mid Cap Value ETF (FEMV) is an ETF from Fidelity Investments (US) and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Year to date, FEMV is up 7.60% versus a gain of 13.02% for VTI.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

FEMV charges 0.23% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $23 vs $3 annually, a gap of $20 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FEMV currently yields 0.61% against 1.06% for VTI.

Holdings Overlap

FEMV already in VTI95.3%
VTI already in FEMV8.2%

95.3% of FEMV's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 8.2% of VTI's money is in holdings FEMV also owns.

Most of FEMV is already inside VTI. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.

248 positions in common, counted across the 261 positions we hold weights for in FEMV and 3,441 in VTI, against full books of 262 and 3,524.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 916 positions for VTI that do not appear in our book for FEMV (89.5% of the fund), and 5 for FEMV that do not appear in VTI (1.3%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in FEMVWeight in VTIDifference
MPCMarathon Petroleum Corp1.10%0.15%0.95%
HPEHewlett Packard Enterprise Co1.08%0.09%0.99%
NUENucor Corp.1.07%0.08%0.99%
STTState Street Corp.1.04%0.07%0.97%
DLRDigital Realty Trust Inc.1.00%0.09%0.91%
PSXPhillips 660.94%0.13%0.81%
CTVACorteva Inc Ctva0.98%0.08%0.90%
AMEAmetek Inc0.98%0.07%0.91%
KMIKinder Morgan Inc./de0.97%0.08%0.89%
IQVI Q V I A Holdings Inc.0.96%0.06%0.90%

95.3% of FEMV is already inside VTI.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

FEMVVTI

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, FEMV or VTI?

FEMV has an expense ratio of 0.23% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $20 a year on a $10,000 investment.

What is the holdings overlap between FEMV and VTI?

95.3% of FEMV's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 8.2% of VTI's is in holdings FEMV also owns. They hold 248 positions in common, counted across the 261 positions we hold weights for in FEMV and 3,441 in VTI.

Which pays a higher dividend, FEMV or VTI?

FEMV yields 0.61% while VTI yields 1.06%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is VTI better than FEMV?

VTI has a lower expense ratio. FEMV is less concentrated, with 10.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 33.5%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.