FEUS vs QLV
Northern Trust ESG & Climate US Large Cap Core ETF vs Northern Trust US Quality Low Volatility ETF
Which is better, FEUS or QLV?
FEUS has been ahead.
QLV has a lower expense ratio. FEUS led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.90. QLV is less concentrated, with 36.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 40.7%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FEUS | QLV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.09% | 0.08%Best |
| AUM | $128M | $171M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.00% | 1.50% |
| Holdings | 132 | 125 |
| YTD Return | +14.43%Best | +13.30% |
| 1Y Return | +18.43%Best | +14.01% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +20.62%Best | +16.91% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +11.92%Best | +10.85% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.9% | 11.9%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -25.3% | -17.9%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $17,561Best | $16,737 |
| Top 10 Weight | 40.7% | 36.8%Best |
| Fund Family | Northern Trust Asset Management | Northern Trust Asset Management |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Sep 20, 2021 | Jul 15, 2019 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Sep 21, 2021 to Oct 14, 2026 (5.1 years).
FEUS vs QLV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 5.1 years both funds cover.
FEUS vs QLV Performance
Northern Trust ESG & Climate US Large Cap Core ETF (FEUS) is an ETF from Northern Trust Asset Management and Northern Trust US Quality Low Volatility ETF (QLV) is an ETF from Northern Trust Asset Management. Over the past year FEUS returned +18.43% while QLV returned +14.01%. Year to date, FEUS is up 14.43% versus a gain of 13.30% for QLV.
Over three years, FEUS compounded at +20.62% per year against +16.91% for QLV; over five years the annualized figures are +11.92% and +10.85% respectively.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
FEUS has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.9% compared with 11.9% for QLV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -25.3% for FEUS and -17.9% for QLV. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.90. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FEUS charges 0.09% per year while QLV charges 0.08%. On a $10,000 position that is $9 vs $8 annually, a gap of $1 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FEUS currently yields 1.00% against 1.50% for QLV.
Holdings Overlap
54.7% of FEUS's money is in holdings QLV also owns. 49.9% of QLV's money is in holdings FEUS also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
32 positions in common, counted across the 128 positions we hold weights for in FEUS and 120 in QLV, against full books of 132 and 125.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 82 positions for QLV that do not appear in our book for FEUS (47.4% of the fund), and 96 for FEUS that do not appear in QLV (44.6%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in FEUS | Weight in QLV | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp. | 8.52% | 6.86% | 1.66% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 7.22% | 6.09% | 1.13% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp 4.100 Feb 06 37 | 6.09% | 6.58% | 0.49% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 4.09% | 2.46% | 1.63% |
| JNJJohnson & Johnson - Common | 1.65% | 4.25% | 2.60% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc-cl A | 3.56% | 1.94% | 1.62% |
| GOOGAlphabet, Inc.- Cl C | 2.97% | 1.47% | 1.50% |
| VVisa Inc. 'A' | 1.65% | 2.15% | 0.50% |
| METAMeta Platform Inc | 2.28% | 1.04% | 1.24% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 1.39% | 1.81% | 0.42% |
54.7% of FEUS is already inside QLV.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FEUS or QLV?
FEUS has an expense ratio of 0.09% while QLV charges 0.08%. QLV is the cheaper option, by $1 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, FEUS or QLV?
Over the past year FEUS returned +18.43% vs +14.01% for QLV, so FEUS leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, FEUS or QLV?
FEUS has been the more volatile fund at 15.9% annualized versus 11.9% for QLV. Worst drawdown: FEUS -25.3% vs QLV -17.9%.
Should I hold both FEUS and QLV?
FEUS and QLV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.90, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between FEUS and QLV?
54.7% of FEUS's money is in holdings QLV also owns. 49.9% of QLV's is in holdings FEUS also owns. They hold 32 positions in common, counted across the 128 positions we hold weights for in FEUS and 120 in QLV.
Which pays a higher dividend, FEUS or QLV?
FEUS yields 1.00% while QLV yields 1.50%, so QLV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is QLV better than FEUS?
QLV has a lower expense ratio. FEUS led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.90. QLV is less concentrated, with 36.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 40.7%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.