FFLC vs GEND
Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Core ETF vs Genter Capital Dividend Income ETF
Which is better, FFLC or GEND?
GEND has been ahead.
GEND led over 1Y and the full window. GEND is less concentrated, with 40.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 41.9%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FFLC | GEND |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.38%Tie | 0.38%Tie |
| AUM | $1.2B | $6M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.01% | 3.06% |
| Holdings | 216 | 33 |
| YTD Return | +9.90% | +15.57%Best |
| 1Y Return | +14.13% | +19.77%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +22.06% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +15.97% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 13.6% | 10.8%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -19.7% | -13.3%Best |
| $10,000 over 1.7 years | $12,864 | $13,510Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 41.9% | 40.3%Best |
| Fund Family | Fidelity Investments (US) | Genter Capital Management |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Jun 2, 2020 | Dec 31, 2024 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.7 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jan 13, 2025 to Oct 14, 2026 (1.7 years).
FFLC vs GEND growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.7 years both funds cover.
FFLC vs GEND Performance
Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Core ETF (FFLC) is an ETF from Fidelity Investments (US) and Genter Capital Dividend Income ETF (GEND) is an ETF from Genter Capital Management. Over the past year FFLC returned +14.13% while GEND returned +19.77%. Year to date, FFLC is up 9.90% versus a gain of 15.57% for GEND.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
FFLC has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 13.6% compared with 10.8% for GEND. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -19.7% for FFLC and -13.3% for GEND. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.48. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FFLC charges 0.38% per year while GEND charges 0.38%. On a $10,000 position that is $38 vs $38 annually. On income, FFLC currently yields 1.01% against 3.06% for GEND.
Holdings Overlap
4.0% of FFLC's money is in holdings GEND also owns. 17.0% of GEND's money is in holdings FFLC also owns.
GEND and FFLC share little of their money.
7 positions in common, counted across the 108 positions we hold weights for in FFLC and 35 in GEND, against full books of 216 and 33.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 25 positions for GEND that do not appear in our book for FFLC (73.7% of the fund), and 89 for FFLC that do not appear in GEND (87.7%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in FFLC | Weight in GEND | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MRKMerck & Company Inc | 0.67% | 3.87% | 3.20% |
| MTBM&T Bank Corp | 0.56% | 3.56% | 3.00% |
| UPSUnited Parcel Service, Inc | 0.70% | 2.83% | 2.13% |
| SRESempra Common Stock | 0.46% | 2.87% | 2.41% |
| HDHome Depot Inc/The | 0.75% | 1.35% | 0.60% |
| GILDGilead Sciences | 0.58% | 1.48% | 0.90% |
| JNJJohnson & Johnson - Common | 0.25% | 1.02% | 0.77% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of FFLC and GEND you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FFLC or GEND?
FFLC has an expense ratio of 0.38% while GEND charges 0.38%. At the precision these are quoted to, they cost the same.
Which performed better, FFLC or GEND?
Over the past year FFLC returned +14.13% vs +19.77% for GEND, so GEND leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), FFLC annualized +15.97% vs +19.36% for GEND. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, FFLC or GEND?
FFLC has been the more volatile fund at 13.6% annualized versus 10.8% for GEND. Worst drawdown: FFLC -19.7% vs GEND -13.3%.
Should I hold both FFLC and GEND?
FFLC and GEND have a monthly-return correlation of 0.48, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between FFLC and GEND?
17.0% of GEND's money is in holdings FFLC also owns. 17.0% of GEND's is in holdings FFLC also owns. They hold 7 positions in common, counted across the 108 positions we hold weights for in FFLC and 35 in GEND.
Which pays a higher dividend, FFLC or GEND?
FFLC yields 1.01% while GEND yields 3.06%, so GEND currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is GEND better than FFLC?
GEND led over 1Y and the full window. GEND is less concentrated, with 40.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 41.9%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.