FFLC vs WBIF
Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Core ETF vs WBI BullBear Value 3000 ETF
Which is better, FFLC or WBIF?
Each has led over a different period.
FFLC has a lower expense ratio. FFLC led over 3Y, 5Y and the full window, WBIF over 1Y.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FFLC | WBIF |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.38%Best | 1.65% |
| AUM | $1.2B | $23M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.01% | 0.00% |
| Holdings | 216 | 152 |
| YTD Return | +9.90% | +14.87%Best |
| 1Y Return | +14.13% | +15.37%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +22.06%Best | +10.35% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +15.97%Best | +4.01% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.8% | 13.5%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -19.7%Best | -20.3% |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $20,976Best | $12,172 |
| Fund Family | Fidelity Investments (US) | WBI Investments |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Jun 2, 2020 | Aug 25, 2014 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Jun 4, 2020 to Oct 14, 2026 (6.4 years).
FFLC vs WBIF growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 6.4 years both funds cover.
FFLC vs WBIF Performance
Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Core ETF (FFLC) is an ETF from Fidelity Investments (US) and WBI BullBear Value 3000 ETF (WBIF) is an ETF from WBI Investments. Over the past year FFLC returned +14.13% while WBIF returned +15.37%. Year to date, FFLC is up 9.90% versus a gain of 14.87% for WBIF.
Over three years, FFLC compounded at +22.06% per year against +10.35% for WBIF; over five years the annualized figures are +15.97% and +4.01% respectively. Across the full 6-year window we track, FFLC has the edge at +19.16% annualized vs +5.97%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
FFLC has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.8% compared with 13.5% for WBIF. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -19.7% for FFLC and -20.3% for WBIF. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.76. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FFLC charges 0.38% per year while WBIF charges 1.65%. On a $10,000 position that is $38 vs $165 annually, a gap of $127 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FFLC currently yields 1.01% against 0.00% for WBIF.
Holdings Overlap
At least 4.0% of FFLC's money is in holdings WBIF also owns.
Stated as a floor: for WBIF, our book for it covers 83.6% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
FFLC and WBIF share little of their money.
2 positions in common, counted across the 108 positions we hold weights for in FFLC and 62 in WBIF, against full books of 216 and 152.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of FFLC and WBIF you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FFLC or WBIF?
FFLC has an expense ratio of 0.38% while WBIF charges 1.65%. FFLC is the cheaper option, by $127 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, FFLC or WBIF?
Over the past year FFLC returned +14.13% vs +15.37% for WBIF, so WBIF leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (6 years), FFLC annualized +19.16% vs +5.97% for WBIF. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, FFLC or WBIF?
FFLC has been the more volatile fund at 15.8% annualized versus 13.5% for WBIF. Worst drawdown: FFLC -19.7% vs WBIF -20.3%.
Should I hold both FFLC and WBIF?
FFLC and WBIF have a monthly-return correlation of 0.76, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between FFLC and WBIF?
At least 4.0% of FFLC's money is in holdings WBIF also owns. Our book for WBIF is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 2 positions in common, counted across the 108 positions we hold weights for in FFLC and 62 in WBIF.
Which pays a higher dividend, FFLC or WBIF?
FFLC yields 1.01% while WBIF yields 0.00%, so FFLC currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is WBIF better than FFLC?
FFLC has a lower expense ratio. FFLC led over 3Y, 5Y and the full window, WBIF over 1Y. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.