FFLG vs SAWG
Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Growth ETF vs AAM Sawgrass US Large Cap Quality Growth ETF
Which is better, FFLG or SAWG?
FFLG has been ahead.
FFLG has a lower expense ratio. FFLG led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.93.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FFLG | SAWG |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.38%Best | 0.49% |
| AUM | $635M | $3M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.07% | 0.25% |
| Holdings | 202 | 45 |
| YTD Return | +11.11% | +12.08%Best |
| 1Y Return | +14.85%Best | +14.42% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +25.80% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +9.81% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 19.1% | 11.7%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -26.7% | -18.7%Best |
| $10,000 over 2.2 years | $14,576Best | $13,110 |
| Fund Family | Fidelity Investments (US) | Advisors Asset Management, Inc. |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Feb 2, 2021 | Jul 30, 2024 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.2 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jul 31, 2024 to Oct 14, 2026 (2.2 years).
FFLG vs SAWG growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2.2 years both funds cover.
FFLG vs SAWG Performance
Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Growth ETF (FFLG) is an ETF from Fidelity Investments (US) and AAM Sawgrass US Large Cap Quality Growth ETF (SAWG) is an ETF from Advisors Asset Management, Inc.. Over the past year FFLG returned +14.85% while SAWG returned +14.42%. Year to date, FFLG is up 11.11% versus a gain of 12.08% for SAWG.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
FFLG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 19.1% compared with 11.7% for SAWG. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -26.7% for FFLG and -18.7% for SAWG. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.93. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FFLG charges 0.38% per year while SAWG charges 0.49%. On a $10,000 position that is $38 vs $49 annually, a gap of $11 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FFLG currently yields 0.07% against 0.25% for SAWG.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 101 holdings in FFLG and 1 in SAWG, totalling 99.3% and 0.0% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 101 positions we hold weights for in FFLG and 1 in SAWG, against full books of 202 and 45.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of FFLG and SAWG you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FFLG or SAWG?
FFLG has an expense ratio of 0.38% while SAWG charges 0.49%. FFLG is the cheaper option, by $11 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, FFLG or SAWG?
Over the past year FFLG returned +14.85% vs +14.42% for SAWG, so FFLG leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), FFLG annualized +18.68% vs +13.10% for SAWG. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, FFLG or SAWG?
FFLG has been the more volatile fund at 19.1% annualized versus 11.7% for SAWG. Worst drawdown: FFLG -26.7% vs SAWG -18.7%.
Should I hold both FFLG and SAWG?
FFLG and SAWG have a monthly-return correlation of 0.93, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, FFLG or SAWG?
FFLG yields 0.07% while SAWG yields 0.25%, so SAWG currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is SAWG better than FFLG?
FFLG has a lower expense ratio. FFLG led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.93. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.