FFLV vs LSVD
Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Value ETF vs LSV Disciplined Value ETF
Which is better, FFLV or LSVD?
LSVD has been ahead.
FFLV has a lower expense ratio. LSVD led over 1Y and the full window. FFLV is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 35.0%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FFLV | LSVD |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.38%Best | 0.40% |
| AUM | $18M | $678M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.36% | 0.27% |
| Holdings | 230 | 136 |
| YTD Return | +14.51% | +20.92%Best |
| 1Y Return | +21.86% | +30.07%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 10.2%Best | 13.3% |
| Max Drawdown | -13.2%Best | -19.3% |
| $10,000 over 1.8 years | $13,417 | $14,810Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 33.3%Best | 35.0% |
| Fund Family | Fidelity Investments (US) | LSV Asset Management |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Feb 9, 2024 | Dec 17, 2024 |
Not shown on this pair: 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized).
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.8 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Dec 18, 2024 to Oct 14, 2026 (1.8 years).
FFLV vs LSVD growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.8 years both funds cover.
FFLV vs LSVD Performance
Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Value ETF (FFLV) is an ETF from Fidelity Investments (US) and LSV Disciplined Value ETF (LSVD) is an ETF from LSV Asset Management. Over the past year FFLV returned +21.86% while LSVD returned +30.07%. Year to date, FFLV is up 14.51% versus a gain of 20.92% for LSVD.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
LSVD has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 13.3% compared with 10.2% for FFLV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -13.2% for FFLV and -19.3% for LSVD. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.68. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FFLV charges 0.38% per year while LSVD charges 0.40%. On a $10,000 position that is $38 vs $40 annually, a gap of $2 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FFLV currently yields 1.36% against 0.27% for LSVD.
Holdings Overlap
48.4% of FFLV's money is in holdings LSVD also owns. 41.3% of LSVD's money is in holdings FFLV also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
35 positions in common, counted across the 115 positions we hold weights for in FFLV and 135 in LSVD, against full books of 230 and 136.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 98 positions for LSVD that do not appear in our book for FFLV (58.4% of the fund), and 67 for FFLV that do not appear in LSVD (42.8%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in FFLV | Weight in LSVD | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| AAPLApple, Inc | 5.11% | 5.62% | 0.51% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 6.42% | 3.67% | 2.75% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 4.77% | 3.33% | 1.44% |
| XOMExxonmobil Corp. | 4.05% | 0.50% | 3.55% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc | 0.76% | 3.61% | 2.85% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 0.91% | 2.80% | 1.89% |
| MRKMerck & Company Inc | 2.27% | 1.12% | 1.15% |
| CSCOCisco Systems Inc. - Ordinary Shares | 1.43% | 1.59% | 0.16% |
| WFCWells Fargo & Co. | 2.59% | 0.34% | 2.25% |
| CRMSalesforce Inc Crm Us Equity | 1.32% | 1.50% | 0.18% |
48.4% of FFLV is already inside LSVD.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FFLV or LSVD?
FFLV has an expense ratio of 0.38% while LSVD charges 0.40%. FFLV is the cheaper option, by $2 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, FFLV or LSVD?
Over the past year FFLV returned +21.86% vs +30.07% for LSVD, so LSVD leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), FFLV annualized +17.74% vs +24.38% for LSVD. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, FFLV or LSVD?
LSVD has been the more volatile fund at 13.3% annualized versus 10.2% for FFLV. Worst drawdown: FFLV -13.2% vs LSVD -19.3%.
Should I hold both FFLV and LSVD?
FFLV and LSVD have a monthly-return correlation of 0.68, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between FFLV and LSVD?
48.4% of FFLV's money is in holdings LSVD also owns. 41.3% of LSVD's is in holdings FFLV also owns. They hold 35 positions in common, counted across the 115 positions we hold weights for in FFLV and 135 in LSVD.
Which pays a higher dividend, FFLV or LSVD?
FFLV yields 1.36% while LSVD yields 0.27%, so FFLV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is LSVD better than FFLV?
FFLV has a lower expense ratio. LSVD led over 1Y and the full window. FFLV is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 35.0%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.