FFLV vs PSIL
Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Value ETF vs ADVISORSHARES PSYCHEDELICS ETF
Which is better, FFLV or PSIL?
Each has led over a different period.
FFLV has a lower expense ratio. FFLV led over 1Y, PSIL over the full window. FFLV is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 64.2%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FFLV | PSIL |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.38%Best | 1.00% |
| AUM | $18M | $44M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.36% | 7.45% |
| Holdings | 230 | 33 |
| YTD Return | +14.51% | +16.80%Best |
| 1Y Return | +21.86%Best | +9.75% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +14.39% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | -23.59% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 12.4%Best | 48.9% |
| Max Drawdown | -16.7%Best | -56.0% |
| $10,000 over 2.6 years | $14,372 | $15,596Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 33.3%Best | 64.2% |
| Fund Family | Fidelity Investments (US) | Advisor Shares |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Feb 9, 2024 | Sep 15, 2021 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.6 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Feb 26, 2024 to Oct 14, 2026 (2.6 years).
FFLV vs PSIL growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2.6 years both funds cover.
FFLV vs PSIL Performance
Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Value ETF (FFLV) is an ETF from Fidelity Investments (US) and ADVISORSHARES PSYCHEDELICS ETF (PSIL) is an ETF from Advisor Shares. Over the past year FFLV returned +21.86% while PSIL returned +9.75%. Year to date, FFLV is up 14.51% versus a gain of 16.80% for PSIL.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
PSIL has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 48.9% compared with 12.4% for FFLV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -16.7% for FFLV and -56.0% for PSIL. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.25. They move largely independently of each other.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FFLV charges 0.38% per year while PSIL charges 1.00%. On a $10,000 position that is $38 vs $100 annually, a gap of $62 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FFLV currently yields 1.36% against 7.45% for PSIL.
Holdings Overlap
1.8% of FFLV's money is in holdings PSIL also owns. 4.3% of PSIL's money is in holdings FFLV also owns.
PSIL and FFLV share little of their money.
1 positions in common, counted across the 115 positions we hold weights for in FFLV and 29 in PSIL, against full books of 230 and 33.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 18 positions for PSIL that do not appear in our book for FFLV (58.2% of the fund), and 101 for FFLV that do not appear in PSIL (89.3%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in FFLV | Weight in PSIL | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| JNJJohnson & Johnson - Common | 1.81% | 4.33% | 2.52% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of FFLV and PSIL you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FFLV or PSIL?
FFLV has an expense ratio of 0.38% while PSIL charges 1.00%. FFLV is the cheaper option, by $62 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, FFLV or PSIL?
Over the past year FFLV returned +21.86% vs +9.75% for PSIL, so FFLV leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, FFLV or PSIL?
PSIL has been the more volatile fund at 48.9% annualized versus 12.4% for FFLV. Worst drawdown: FFLV -16.7% vs PSIL -56.0%.
Should I hold both FFLV and PSIL?
FFLV and PSIL have a monthly-return correlation of 0.25, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between FFLV and PSIL?
4.3% of PSIL's money is in holdings FFLV also owns. 4.3% of PSIL's is in holdings FFLV also owns. They hold 1 positions in common, counted across the 115 positions we hold weights for in FFLV and 29 in PSIL.
Which pays a higher dividend, FFLV or PSIL?
FFLV yields 1.36% while PSIL yields 7.45%, so PSIL currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is PSIL better than FFLV?
FFLV has a lower expense ratio. FFLV led over 1Y, PSIL over the full window. FFLV is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 64.2%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.