FFND vs SROI
One Global ETF vs Calamos Antetokounmpo Global Sustainable Equities ETF
Which is better, FFND or SROI?
Each has led over a different period.
SROI has a lower expense ratio. FFND led over 3Y and the full window, SROI over 1Y. FFND is less concentrated, with 27.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 32.0%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FFND | SROI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.00% | 0.95%Best |
| AUM | $96M | $17M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.61% | 0.54% |
| Holdings | 92 | 130 |
| YTD Return | +4.71% | +10.48%Best |
| 1Y Return | +7.86% | +13.66%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +19.41%Best | +16.01% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +4.62% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.9% | 12.1%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -18.9% | -15.9%Best |
| $10,000 over 3.7 years | $18,327Best | $15,381 |
| Top 10 Weight | 27.0%Best | 32.0% |
| Fund Family | The Future Fund | Calamos Investments |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Aug 24, 2021 | Feb 3, 2023 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 3.7 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Feb 6, 2023 to Oct 14, 2026 (3.7 years).
FFND vs SROI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 3.7 years both funds cover.
FFND vs SROI Performance
One Global ETF (FFND) is an ETF from The Future Fund and Calamos Antetokounmpo Global Sustainable Equities ETF (SROI) is an ETF from Calamos Investments. Over the past year FFND returned +7.86% while SROI returned +13.66%. Year to date, FFND is up 4.71% versus a gain of 10.48% for SROI.
Over three years, FFND compounded at +19.41% per year against +16.01% for SROI. Across the full 4-year window we track, FFND has the edge at +17.79% annualized vs +12.34%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
FFND has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.9% compared with 12.1% for SROI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -18.9% for FFND and -15.9% for SROI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.80. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FFND charges 1.00% per year while SROI charges 0.95%. On a $10,000 position that is $100 vs $95 annually, a gap of $5 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FFND currently yields 0.61% against 0.54% for SROI.
Holdings Overlap
31.9% of FFND's money is in holdings SROI also owns. 33.8% of SROI's money is in holdings FFND also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
18 positions in common, counted across the 88 positions we hold weights for in FFND and 123 in SROI, against full books of 92 and 130.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 49 positions for SROI that do not appear in our book for FFND (32.4% of the fund), and 54 for FFND that do not appear in SROI (52.3%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in FFND | Weight in SROI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| AAPLApple, Inc | 4.68% | 4.54% | 0.14% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc | 2.83% | 5.54% | 2.71% |
| NVDANvidia Corp | 3.48% | 4.43% | 0.95% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 4.29% | 2.61% | 1.68% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 2.85% | 4.04% | 1.19% |
| 2330:TWTaiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Ltd | 1.48% | 3.91% | 2.43% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 2.18% | 1.58% | 0.60% |
| VVisa Inc Class A | 1.09% | 1.63% | 0.54% |
| TMOThermo Fisherscientific Inc. | 1.36% | 0.69% | 0.67% |
| 6758:JPSony Corp | 1.07% | 0.82% | 0.25% |
33.8% of SROI is already inside FFND.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FFND or SROI?
FFND has an expense ratio of 1.00% while SROI charges 0.95%. SROI is the cheaper option, by $5 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, FFND or SROI?
Over the past year FFND returned +7.86% vs +13.66% for SROI, so SROI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), FFND annualized +17.79% vs +12.34% for SROI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, FFND or SROI?
FFND has been the more volatile fund at 15.9% annualized versus 12.1% for SROI. Worst drawdown: FFND -18.9% vs SROI -15.9%.
Should I hold both FFND and SROI?
FFND and SROI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.80, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between FFND and SROI?
33.8% of SROI's money is in holdings FFND also owns. 33.8% of SROI's is in holdings FFND also owns. They hold 18 positions in common, counted across the 88 positions we hold weights for in FFND and 123 in SROI.
Which pays a higher dividend, FFND or SROI?
FFND yields 0.61% while SROI yields 0.54%, so FFND currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is SROI better than FFND?
SROI has a lower expense ratio. FFND led over 3Y and the full window, SROI over 1Y. FFND is less concentrated, with 27.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 32.0%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.