FFND vs WUGI
One Global ETF vs AXS Esoterica NextG Economy ETF
Which is better, FFND or WUGI?
Each has led over a different period.
WUGI has a lower expense ratio. FFND led over 1Y, WUGI over 3Y, 5Y and the full window. FFND is less concentrated, with 27.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 58.8%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FFND | WUGI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.00% | 0.84%Best |
| AUM | $96M | $33M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.61% | 0.22% |
| Holdings | 92 | 35 |
| YTD Return | +4.71% | +15.77%Best |
| 1Y Return | +7.86%Best | -5.57% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +19.41% | +24.18%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +4.62% | +7.64%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 22.6%Best | 29.7% |
| Max Drawdown | -47.8%Best | -56.4% |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $12,534 | $14,450Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 27.0%Best | 58.8% |
| Fund Family | The Future Fund | AXS Investments |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Aug 24, 2021 | Mar 31, 2020 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Aug 24, 2021 to Oct 14, 2026 (5.1 years).
FFND vs WUGI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 5.1 years both funds cover.
FFND vs WUGI Performance
One Global ETF (FFND) is an ETF from The Future Fund and AXS Esoterica NextG Economy ETF (WUGI) is an ETF from AXS Investments. Over the past year FFND returned +7.86% while WUGI returned -5.57%. Year to date, FFND is up 4.71% versus a gain of 15.77% for WUGI.
Over three years, FFND compounded at +19.41% per year against +24.18% for WUGI; over five years the annualized figures are +4.62% and +7.64% respectively.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
WUGI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 29.7% compared with 22.6% for FFND. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -47.8% for FFND and -56.4% for WUGI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.73. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FFND charges 1.00% per year while WUGI charges 0.84%. On a $10,000 position that is $100 vs $84 annually, a gap of $16 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FFND currently yields 0.61% against 0.22% for WUGI.
Holdings Overlap
14.8% of FFND's money is in holdings WUGI also owns. 28.1% of WUGI's money is in holdings FFND also owns.
WUGI and FFND share little of their money.
6 positions in common, counted across the 88 positions we hold weights for in FFND and 31 in WUGI, against full books of 92 and 35.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 22 positions for WUGI that do not appear in our book for FFND (63.1% of the fund), and 63 for FFND that do not appear in WUGI (66.5%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
28.1% of WUGI is already inside FFND.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FFND or WUGI?
FFND has an expense ratio of 1.00% while WUGI charges 0.84%. WUGI is the cheaper option, by $16 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, FFND or WUGI?
Over the past year FFND returned +7.86% vs -5.57% for WUGI, so FFND leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, FFND or WUGI?
WUGI has been the more volatile fund at 29.7% annualized versus 22.6% for FFND. Worst drawdown: FFND -47.8% vs WUGI -56.4%.
Should I hold both FFND and WUGI?
FFND and WUGI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.73, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between FFND and WUGI?
28.1% of WUGI's money is in holdings FFND also owns. 28.1% of WUGI's is in holdings FFND also owns. They hold 6 positions in common, counted across the 88 positions we hold weights for in FFND and 31 in WUGI.
Which pays a higher dividend, FFND or WUGI?
FFND yields 0.61% while WUGI yields 0.22%, so FFND currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is WUGI better than FFND?
WUGI has a lower expense ratio. FFND led over 1Y, WUGI over 3Y, 5Y and the full window. FFND is less concentrated, with 27.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 58.8%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.