FFOG vs HFGO
Franklin Focused Dynamic Growth ETF vs Hartford Large Cap Growth ETF
Which is better, FFOG or HFGO?
Nearly the same fund. FFOG costs less.
FFOG has a lower expense ratio. HFGO led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.96. FFOG is less concentrated, with 55.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 61.2%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FFOG | HFGO |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.41%Best | 0.59% |
| AUM | $386M | $186M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Holdings | 43 | 48 |
| YTD Return | +8.34% | +8.71%Best |
| 1Y Return | +7.46% | +10.28%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +25.71%Tie | +25.71%Tie |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +8.72% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 20.1% | 18.1%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -25.4% | -25.2%Best |
| $10,000 over 2.9 years | $19,417 | $19,551Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 55.5%Best | 61.2% |
| Fund Family | Franklin Templeton Investments (US) | Hartford Funds |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Nov 6, 2023 | Nov 9, 2021 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.9 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Nov 6, 2023 to Oct 14, 2026 (2.9 years).
FFOG vs HFGO growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2.9 years both funds cover.
FFOG vs HFGO Performance
Franklin Focused Dynamic Growth ETF (FFOG) is an ETF from Franklin Templeton Investments (US) and Hartford Large Cap Growth ETF (HFGO) is an ETF from Hartford Funds. Over the past year FFOG returned +7.46% while HFGO returned +10.28%. Year to date, FFOG is up 8.34% versus a gain of 8.71% for HFGO.
Over three years, FFOG compounded at +25.71% per year against +25.71% for HFGO.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
FFOG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 20.1% compared with 18.1% for HFGO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -25.4% for FFOG and -25.2% for HFGO. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.96. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FFOG charges 0.41% per year while HFGO charges 0.59%. On a $10,000 position that is $41 vs $59 annually, a gap of $18 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FFOG currently yields 0.00% against 0.00% for HFGO.
Holdings Overlap
70.4% of FFOG's money is in holdings HFGO also owns. 74.7% of HFGO's money is in holdings FFOG also owns.
Most of HFGO is already inside FFOG. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
20 positions in common, counted across the 41 positions we hold weights for in FFOG and 46 in HFGO, against full books of 43 and 48.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 23 positions for HFGO that do not appear in our book for FFOG (21.7% of the fund), and 15 for FFOG that do not appear in HFGO (19.9%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in FFOG | Weight in HFGO | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 10.05% | 16.55% | 6.50% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc | 7.96% | 9.88% | 1.92% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 8.49% | 4.50% | 3.99% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 5.50% | 4.81% | 0.69% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 4.98% | 4.54% | 0.44% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 3.90% | 5.33% | 1.43% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 3.45% | 5.41% | 1.96% |
| SNDKVSandisk Corp. | 3.92% | 3.49% | 0.43% |
| LLYEli Lilly & Co. | 2.01% | 3.82% | 1.81% |
| ANETArista Networks Inc Common Stock | 1.46% | 2.85% | 1.39% |
74.7% of HFGO is already inside FFOG.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FFOG or HFGO?
FFOG has an expense ratio of 0.41% while HFGO charges 0.59%. FFOG is the cheaper option, by $18 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, FFOG or HFGO?
Over the past year FFOG returned +7.46% vs +10.28% for HFGO, so HFGO leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, FFOG or HFGO?
FFOG has been the more volatile fund at 20.1% annualized versus 18.1% for HFGO. Worst drawdown: FFOG -25.4% vs HFGO -25.2%.
Should I hold both FFOG and HFGO?
FFOG and HFGO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.96, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between FFOG and HFGO?
74.7% of HFGO's money is in holdings FFOG also owns. 74.7% of HFGO's is in holdings FFOG also owns. They hold 20 positions in common, counted across the 41 positions we hold weights for in FFOG and 46 in HFGO.
Which pays a higher dividend, FFOG or HFGO?
FFOG yields 0.00% while HFGO yields 0.00%, so HFGO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is HFGO better than FFOG?
FFOG has a lower expense ratio. HFGO led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.96. FFOG is less concentrated, with 55.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 61.2%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.