FFOG vs MFSG
Franklin Focused Dynamic Growth ETF vs MFS Active Growth ETF
Which is better, FFOG or MFSG?
Nearly the same fund. FFOG costs less.
FFOG has a lower expense ratio. FFOG led over the full window, MFSG over 1Y. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.96. MFSG is less concentrated, with 53.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 55.5%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FFOG | MFSG |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.41%Best | 0.49% |
| AUM | $386M | $406M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 0.06% |
| Holdings | 43 | 69 |
| YTD Return | +8.34%Best | +7.53% |
| 1Y Return | +7.46% | +9.18%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +25.71% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 22.7% | 17.5%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -25.4% | -23.2%Best |
| $10,000 over 1.9 years | $12,317Best | $12,025 |
| Top 10 Weight | 55.5% | 53.3%Best |
| Fund Family | Franklin Templeton Investments (US) | MFS Investment Management |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Nov 6, 2023 | Dec 5, 2024 |
Not shown on this pair: 5Y Return (annualized).
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.9 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Dec 5, 2024 to Oct 14, 2026 (1.9 years).
FFOG vs MFSG growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.9 years both funds cover.
FFOG vs MFSG Performance
Franklin Focused Dynamic Growth ETF (FFOG) is an ETF from Franklin Templeton Investments (US) and MFS Active Growth ETF (MFSG) is an ETF from MFS Investment Management. Over the past year FFOG returned +7.46% while MFSG returned +9.18%. Year to date, FFOG is up 8.34% versus a gain of 7.53% for MFSG.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
FFOG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 22.7% compared with 17.5% for MFSG. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -25.4% for FFOG and -23.2% for MFSG. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.96. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FFOG charges 0.41% per year while MFSG charges 0.49%. On a $10,000 position that is $41 vs $49 annually, a gap of $8 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FFOG currently yields 0.00% against 0.06% for MFSG.
Holdings Overlap
70.2% of FFOG's money is in holdings MFSG also owns. 62.1% of MFSG's money is in holdings FFOG also owns.
Most of FFOG is already inside MFSG. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
20 positions in common, counted across the 41 positions we hold weights for in FFOG and 67 in MFSG, against full books of 43 and 69.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 44 positions for MFSG that do not appear in our book for FFOG (35.1% of the fund), and 14 for FFOG that do not appear in MFSG (19.5%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in FFOG | Weight in MFSG | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 10.05% | 13.98% | 3.93% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc | 7.96% | 11.60% | 3.64% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 5.50% | 6.42% | 0.92% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 8.49% | 2.83% | 5.66% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 3.90% | 5.28% | 1.38% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 4.98% | 2.81% | 2.17% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 3.45% | 3.20% | 0.25% |
| 2330:TWTaiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Ltd | 4.29% | 1.68% | 2.61% |
| SNDKVSandisk Corp. | 3.92% | 0.46% | 3.46% |
| AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc | 2.79% | 1.33% | 1.46% |
70.2% of FFOG is already inside MFSG.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FFOG or MFSG?
FFOG has an expense ratio of 0.41% while MFSG charges 0.49%. FFOG is the cheaper option, by $8 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, FFOG or MFSG?
Over the past year FFOG returned +7.46% vs +9.18% for MFSG, so MFSG leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), FFOG annualized +11.59% vs +10.19% for MFSG. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, FFOG or MFSG?
FFOG has been the more volatile fund at 22.7% annualized versus 17.5% for MFSG. Worst drawdown: FFOG -25.4% vs MFSG -23.2%.
Should I hold both FFOG and MFSG?
FFOG and MFSG have a monthly-return correlation of 0.96, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between FFOG and MFSG?
70.2% of FFOG's money is in holdings MFSG also owns. 62.1% of MFSG's is in holdings FFOG also owns. They hold 20 positions in common, counted across the 41 positions we hold weights for in FFOG and 67 in MFSG.
Which pays a higher dividend, FFOG or MFSG?
FFOG yields 0.00% while MFSG yields 0.06%, so MFSG currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is MFSG better than FFOG?
FFOG has a lower expense ratio. FFOG led over the full window, MFSG over 1Y. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.96. MFSG is less concentrated, with 53.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 55.5%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.