FFOG vs NUGO
Franklin Focused Dynamic Growth ETF vs Nuveen Growth Opportunities ETF
Which is better, FFOG or NUGO?
Nearly the same fund. FFOG costs less.
FFOG has a lower expense ratio. FFOG led over 3Y and the full window, NUGO over 1Y. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.97. FFOG is less concentrated, with 55.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 61.9%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FFOG | NUGO |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.41%Best | 0.50% |
| AUM | $386M | $2.5B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Holdings | 43 | 46 |
| YTD Return | +8.34% | +9.42%Best |
| 1Y Return | +7.46% | +11.31%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +25.71%Best | +23.57% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.11% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 20.1% | 16.5%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -25.4% | -25.1%Best |
| $10,000 over 2.9 years | $19,417Best | $18,652 |
| Top 10 Weight | 55.5%Best | 61.9% |
| Fund Family | Franklin Templeton Investments (US) | Nuveen |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Nov 6, 2023 | Sep 27, 2021 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.9 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Nov 6, 2023 to Oct 14, 2026 (2.9 years).
FFOG vs NUGO growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2.9 years both funds cover.
FFOG vs NUGO Performance
Franklin Focused Dynamic Growth ETF (FFOG) is an ETF from Franklin Templeton Investments (US) and Nuveen Growth Opportunities ETF (NUGO) is an ETF from Nuveen. Over the past year FFOG returned +7.46% while NUGO returned +11.31%. Year to date, FFOG is up 8.34% versus a gain of 9.42% for NUGO.
Over three years, FFOG compounded at +25.71% per year against +23.57% for NUGO.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
FFOG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 20.1% compared with 16.5% for NUGO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -25.4% for FFOG and -25.1% for NUGO. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.97. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FFOG charges 0.41% per year while NUGO charges 0.50%. On a $10,000 position that is $41 vs $50 annually, a gap of $9 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FFOG currently yields 0.00% against 0.00% for NUGO.
Holdings Overlap
68.2% of FFOG's money is in holdings NUGO also owns. 74.5% of NUGO's money is in holdings FFOG also owns.
Most of NUGO is already inside FFOG. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
20 positions in common, counted across the 41 positions we hold weights for in FFOG and 43 in NUGO, against full books of 43 and 46.
What only one of them owns
Measured across the 41 and 43 positions we hold weights for.
FFOG holds 12 positions NUGO does not, 16.0% of the fund.
Largest: NET 2.37%, KLAC 2.22%, BE 2.20%, NTRA 2.06%, INFXX 1.66%
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in FFOG | Weight in NUGO | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 10.05% | 15.71% | 5.66% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc | 7.96% | 10.15% | 2.19% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 5.50% | 7.05% | 1.55% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 3.90% | 7.15% | 3.25% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 8.49% | 1.90% | 6.59% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 3.45% | 5.98% | 2.53% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 4.98% | 2.09% | 2.89% |
| LLYEli Lilly & Co. | 2.01% | 3.86% | 1.85% |
| AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc | 2.79% | 3.05% | 0.26% |
| MAMastercard Inc | 2.62% | 3.09% | 0.47% |
74.5% of NUGO is already inside FFOG.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FFOG or NUGO?
FFOG has an expense ratio of 0.41% while NUGO charges 0.50%. FFOG is the cheaper option, by $9 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, FFOG or NUGO?
Over the past year FFOG returned +7.46% vs +11.31% for NUGO, so NUGO leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, FFOG or NUGO?
FFOG has been the more volatile fund at 20.1% annualized versus 16.5% for NUGO. Worst drawdown: FFOG -25.4% vs NUGO -25.1%.
Should I hold both FFOG and NUGO?
FFOG and NUGO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.97, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between FFOG and NUGO?
74.5% of NUGO's money is in holdings FFOG also owns. 74.5% of NUGO's is in holdings FFOG also owns. They hold 20 positions in common, counted across the 41 positions we hold weights for in FFOG and 43 in NUGO.
Which pays a higher dividend, FFOG or NUGO?
FFOG yields 0.00% while NUGO yields 0.00%, so NUGO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is NUGO better than FFOG?
FFOG has a lower expense ratio. FFOG led over 3Y and the full window, NUGO over 1Y. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.97. FFOG is less concentrated, with 55.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 61.9%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.