FFOG vs NWLG
Franklin Focused Dynamic Growth ETF vs Nuveen Winslow Large-Cap Growth ESG ETF
Which is better, FFOG or NWLG?
Each has led over a different period.
FFOG has a lower expense ratio. FFOG led over the full window, NWLG over 1Y. FFOG is less concentrated, with 55.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 60.4%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FFOG | NWLG |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.41%Best | 0.65% |
| AUM | $386M | $9M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Holdings | 43 | 42 |
| Volatility (annualized) | 17.9%Tie | 17.9%Tie |
| Max Drawdown | -25.4%Best | -26.5% |
| $10,000 over 2.4 years | $16,183Best | $12,744 |
| Top 10 Weight | 55.5%Best | 60.4% |
| Fund Family | Franklin Templeton Investments (US) | Nuveen |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Nov 6, 2023 | Aug 4, 2021 |
Not shown on this pair: YTD Return, 1Y Return, 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized).
The two price series end 191 days apart, so a return over any period would be measuring two different stretches of market. Those rows are withheld. FFOG has data through Oct 14, 2026 and NWLG through Apr 6, 2026.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.4 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Nov 6, 2023 to Apr 6, 2026 (2.4 years).
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
FFOG and NWLG have been equally volatile, both at 17.9% annualized.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -25.4% for FFOG and -26.5% for NWLG. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.50. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FFOG charges 0.41% per year while NWLG charges 0.65%. On a $10,000 position that is $41 vs $65 annually, a gap of $24 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FFOG currently yields 0.00% against 0.00% for NWLG.
Holdings Overlap
52.7% of FFOG's money is in holdings NWLG also owns. 64.7% of NWLG's money is in holdings FFOG also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
The two holdings books were reported 275 days apart, FFOG as of Oct 2, 2026 and NWLG as of Dec 31, 2025, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
17 positions in common, counted across the 41 positions we hold weights for in FFOG and 39 in NWLG, against full books of 43 and 42.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 22 positions for NWLG that do not appear in our book for FFOG (34.7% of the fund), and 16 for FFOG that do not appear in NWLG (32.6%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in FFOG | Weight in NWLG | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 10.05% | 12.49% | 2.44% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 3.90% | 11.29% | 7.39% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 5.50% | 8.76% | 3.26% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 8.49% | 5.22% | 3.27% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 3.45% | 5.58% | 2.13% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 4.98% | 3.44% | 1.54% |
| MAMastercard Inc | 2.62% | 2.45% | 0.17% |
| LLYEli Lilly & Co. | 2.01% | 2.66% | 0.65% |
| TSLATesla Inc | 1.33% | 2.20% | 0.87% |
| AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc | 2.79% | 0.58% | 2.21% |
64.7% of NWLG is already inside FFOG.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FFOG or NWLG?
FFOG has an expense ratio of 0.41% while NWLG charges 0.65%. FFOG is the cheaper option, by $24 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which is riskier, FFOG or NWLG?
FFOG and NWLG have been equally volatile, both at 17.9% annualized. Worst drawdown: FFOG -25.4% vs NWLG -26.5%.
Should I hold both FFOG and NWLG?
FFOG and NWLG have a monthly-return correlation of 0.50, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between FFOG and NWLG?
64.7% of NWLG's money is in holdings FFOG also owns. 64.7% of NWLG's is in holdings FFOG also owns. They hold 17 positions in common, counted across the 41 positions we hold weights for in FFOG and 39 in NWLG.
Which pays a higher dividend, FFOG or NWLG?
FFOG yields 0.00% while NWLG yields 0.00%, so NWLG currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is NWLG better than FFOG?
FFOG has a lower expense ratio. FFOG led over the full window, NWLG over 1Y. FFOG is less concentrated, with 55.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 60.4%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.