FFOG vs PCLC

FFOG vs PCLC

Which is better, FFOG or PCLC?

FFOG costs less.

FFOG has a lower expense ratio. PCLC is less concentrated, with 52.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 55.5%.

Lower Fees: FFOGLess Concentrated: PCLC

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricFFOGPCLC
Expense Ratio0.41%Best0.50%
AUM$386M$1M
Dividend Yield0.00%0.00%
Holdings4339
YTD Return+8.34%Best+1.32%
1Y Return+7.46%-
3Y Return (annualized)+25.71%-
Top 10 Weight55.5%52.1%Best
Fund FamilyFranklin Templeton Investments (US)Polen Capital
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap GrowthLarge Cap Growth
InceptionNov 6, 2023May 18, 2026

Not shown on this pair: 5Y Return (annualized), Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.

FFOG vs PCLC growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

Compare FFOG against instead:FFOG vs SPYFFOG vs QQQFFOG vs VOOFFOG vs VTIPCLC against:PCLC vs VXUS

FFOG vs PCLC Performance

Franklin Focused Dynamic Growth ETF (FFOG) is an ETF from Franklin Templeton Investments (US) and Polen 5Perspectives Large Growth ETF (PCLC) is an ETF from Polen Capital. Year to date, FFOG is up 8.34% versus a gain of 1.32% for PCLC.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

FFOG charges 0.41% per year while PCLC charges 0.50%. On a $10,000 position that is $41 vs $50 annually, a gap of $9 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FFOG currently yields 0.00% against 0.00% for PCLC.

Holdings Overlap

FFOG already in PCLC62.9%
PCLC already in FFOG66.7%

62.9% of FFOG's money is in holdings PCLC also owns. 66.7% of PCLC's money is in holdings FFOG also owns.

The two portfolios partly overlap.

19 positions in common, counted across the 41 positions we hold weights for in FFOG and 39 in PCLC, against full books of 43 and 39.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 16 positions for PCLC that do not appear in our book for FFOG (27.1% of the fund), and 16 for FFOG that do not appear in PCLC (29.1%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in FFOGWeight in PCLCDifference
NVDANvidia Corp10.05%10.62%0.57%
GOOGLAlphabet Inc7.96%7.38%0.58%
AMZNAmazon.Com Inc8.49%4.61%3.88%
AAPLApple, Inc5.50%2.95%2.55%
2330:TWTaiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Ltd4.29%4.01%0.28%
AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc2.79%4.95%2.16%
AVGOBroadcom Inc3.45%3.64%0.19%
MSFTMicrosoft Corp3.90%2.58%1.32%
TSLATesla Inc1.33%4.87%3.54%
CVNACarvana Co0.39%4.16%3.77%

66.7% of PCLC is already inside FFOG.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

FFOGPCLC

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, FFOG or PCLC?

FFOG has an expense ratio of 0.41% while PCLC charges 0.50%. FFOG is the cheaper option, by $9 a year on a $10,000 investment.

What is the holdings overlap between FFOG and PCLC?

66.7% of PCLC's money is in holdings FFOG also owns. 66.7% of PCLC's is in holdings FFOG also owns. They hold 19 positions in common, counted across the 41 positions we hold weights for in FFOG and 39 in PCLC.

Which pays a higher dividend, FFOG or PCLC?

FFOG yields 0.00% while PCLC yields 0.00%, so PCLC currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is PCLC better than FFOG?

FFOG has a lower expense ratio. PCLC is less concentrated, with 52.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 55.5%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.