FFOG vs PGRO
Franklin Focused Dynamic Growth ETF vs Putnam Focused Large Cap Growth ETF
Which is better, FFOG or PGRO?
Nearly the same fund. FFOG costs less.
FFOG has a lower expense ratio. FFOG led over 3Y and the full window, PGRO over 1Y. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.97. FFOG is less concentrated, with 55.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 58.8%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FFOG | PGRO |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.41%Best | 0.49% |
| AUM | $386M | $222M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 0.02% |
| Holdings | 43 | 43 |
| YTD Return | +8.34%Best | +7.57% |
| 1Y Return | +7.46% | +8.94%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +25.71%Best | +22.58% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +11.60% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 20.1% | 16.2%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -25.4% | -23.3%Best |
| $10,000 over 2.9 years | $19,417Best | $18,193 |
| Top 10 Weight | 55.5%Best | 58.8% |
| Fund Family | Franklin Templeton Investments (US) | Putnam Investments |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Nov 6, 2023 | May 25, 2021 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.9 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Nov 6, 2023 to Oct 14, 2026 (2.9 years).
FFOG vs PGRO growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2.9 years both funds cover.
FFOG vs PGRO Performance
Franklin Focused Dynamic Growth ETF (FFOG) is an ETF from Franklin Templeton Investments (US) and Putnam Focused Large Cap Growth ETF (PGRO) is an ETF from Putnam Investments. Over the past year FFOG returned +7.46% while PGRO returned +8.94%. Year to date, FFOG is up 8.34% versus a gain of 7.57% for PGRO.
Over three years, FFOG compounded at +25.71% per year against +22.58% for PGRO.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
FFOG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 20.1% compared with 16.2% for PGRO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -25.4% for FFOG and -23.3% for PGRO. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.97. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FFOG charges 0.41% per year while PGRO charges 0.49%. On a $10,000 position that is $41 vs $49 annually, a gap of $8 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FFOG currently yields 0.00% against 0.02% for PGRO.
Holdings Overlap
60.7% of FFOG's money is in holdings PGRO also owns. 71.9% of PGRO's money is in holdings FFOG also owns.
Most of PGRO is already inside FFOG. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
17 positions in common, counted across the 41 positions we hold weights for in FFOG and 40 in PGRO, against full books of 43 and 43.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 23 positions for PGRO that do not appear in our book for FFOG (28.1% of the fund), and 16 for FFOG that do not appear in PGRO (24.6%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in FFOG | Weight in PGRO | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 10.05% | 14.08% | 4.03% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc | 7.96% | 9.39% | 1.43% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 5.50% | 6.38% | 0.88% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 8.49% | 2.56% | 5.93% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 4.98% | 4.68% | 0.30% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 3.90% | 5.06% | 1.16% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 3.45% | 4.75% | 1.30% |
| AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc | 2.79% | 3.36% | 0.57% |
| LRCXLrcx Uw Equity | 2.45% | 3.67% | 1.22% |
| LLYEli Lilly & Co. | 2.01% | 3.90% | 1.89% |
71.9% of PGRO is already inside FFOG.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FFOG or PGRO?
FFOG has an expense ratio of 0.41% while PGRO charges 0.49%. FFOG is the cheaper option, by $8 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, FFOG or PGRO?
Over the past year FFOG returned +7.46% vs +8.94% for PGRO, so PGRO leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, FFOG or PGRO?
FFOG has been the more volatile fund at 20.1% annualized versus 16.2% for PGRO. Worst drawdown: FFOG -25.4% vs PGRO -23.3%.
Should I hold both FFOG and PGRO?
FFOG and PGRO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.97, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between FFOG and PGRO?
71.9% of PGRO's money is in holdings FFOG also owns. 71.9% of PGRO's is in holdings FFOG also owns. They hold 17 positions in common, counted across the 41 positions we hold weights for in FFOG and 40 in PGRO.
Which pays a higher dividend, FFOG or PGRO?
FFOG yields 0.00% while PGRO yields 0.02%, so PGRO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is PGRO better than FFOG?
FFOG has a lower expense ratio. FFOG led over 3Y and the full window, PGRO over 1Y. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.97. FFOG is less concentrated, with 55.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 58.8%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.