FFOG vs TFGZ
Franklin Focused Dynamic Growth ETF vs Thornburg Focus Growth Fund ETF
Which is better, FFOG or TFGZ?
TFGZ has been ahead.
FFOG has a lower expense ratio. TFGZ led over 1Y. TFGZ is less concentrated, with 49.4% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 55.5%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FFOG | TFGZ |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.41%Best | 0.79% |
| AUM | $386M | $12M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Holdings | 43 | 43 |
| YTD Return | +8.34% | +16.33%Best |
| 1Y Return | +7.46% | - |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +25.71% | - |
| Top 10 Weight | 55.5% | 49.4%Best |
| Fund Family | Franklin Templeton Investments (US) | Thornburg Investment Management |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Nov 6, 2023 | Apr 1, 2026 |
Not shown on this pair: 5Y Return (annualized), Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
FFOG vs TFGZ growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
FFOG vs TFGZ Performance
Franklin Focused Dynamic Growth ETF (FFOG) is an ETF from Franklin Templeton Investments (US) and Thornburg Focus Growth Fund ETF (TFGZ) is an ETF from Thornburg Investment Management. Year to date, FFOG is up 8.34% versus a gain of 16.33% for TFGZ.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FFOG charges 0.41% per year while TFGZ charges 0.79%. On a $10,000 position that is $41 vs $79 annually, a gap of $38 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FFOG currently yields 0.00% against 0.00% for TFGZ.
Holdings Overlap
29.1% of FFOG's money is in holdings TFGZ also owns. 39.5% of TFGZ's money is in holdings FFOG also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
9 positions in common, counted across the 41 positions we hold weights for in FFOG and 42 in TFGZ, against full books of 43 and 43.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 27 positions for TFGZ that do not appear in our book for FFOG (47.9% of the fund), and 25 for FFOG that do not appear in TFGZ (57.2%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in FFOG | Weight in TFGZ | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc | 7.96% | 12.16% | 4.20% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 3.90% | 7.18% | 3.28% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 3.45% | 6.00% | 2.55% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 4.98% | 3.77% | 1.21% |
| MAMastercard Inc | 2.62% | 3.34% | 0.72% |
| LRCXLrcx Uw Equity | 2.45% | 3.30% | 0.85% |
| LITELumentum Holdings Inc | 1.66% | 1.34% | 0.32% |
| SHOP:CAShopify Inc | 1.18% | 1.43% | 0.25% |
| 0RMV:LNTechnipfmc Plc Ordinary Shares | 0.86% | 0.96% | 0.10% |
39.5% of TFGZ is already inside FFOG.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FFOG or TFGZ?
FFOG has an expense ratio of 0.41% while TFGZ charges 0.79%. FFOG is the cheaper option, by $38 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between FFOG and TFGZ?
39.5% of TFGZ's money is in holdings FFOG also owns. 39.5% of TFGZ's is in holdings FFOG also owns. They hold 9 positions in common, counted across the 41 positions we hold weights for in FFOG and 42 in TFGZ.
Which pays a higher dividend, FFOG or TFGZ?
FFOG yields 0.00% while TFGZ yields 0.00%, so TFGZ currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is TFGZ better than FFOG?
FFOG has a lower expense ratio. TFGZ led over 1Y. TFGZ is less concentrated, with 49.4% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 55.5%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.