FFOG vs WINN
Franklin Focused Dynamic Growth ETF vs Harbor Long-Term Growers ETF
Which is better, FFOG or WINN?
Nearly the same fund. FFOG costs less.
FFOG has a lower expense ratio. FFOG led over 3Y and the full window, WINN over 1Y. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.95. FFOG is less concentrated, with 55.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 57.5%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FFOG | WINN |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.41%Best | 0.57% |
| AUM | $386M | $1.3B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Holdings | 43 | 146 |
| YTD Return | +8.34% | +11.03%Best |
| 1Y Return | +7.46% | +11.42%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +25.71%Best | +22.98% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 20.1% | 16.4%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -25.4% | -23.7%Best |
| $10,000 over 2.9 years | $19,417Best | $18,378 |
| Top 10 Weight | 55.5%Best | 57.5% |
| Fund Family | Franklin Templeton Investments (US) | Harbor Funds |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Nov 6, 2023 | Feb 2, 2022 |
Not shown on this pair: 5Y Return (annualized).
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.9 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Nov 6, 2023 to Oct 14, 2026 (2.9 years).
FFOG vs WINN growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2.9 years both funds cover.
FFOG vs WINN Performance
Franklin Focused Dynamic Growth ETF (FFOG) is an ETF from Franklin Templeton Investments (US) and Harbor Long-Term Growers ETF (WINN) is an ETF from Harbor Funds. Over the past year FFOG returned +7.46% while WINN returned +11.42%. Year to date, FFOG is up 8.34% versus a gain of 11.03% for WINN.
Over three years, FFOG compounded at +25.71% per year against +22.98% for WINN.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
FFOG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 20.1% compared with 16.4% for WINN. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -25.4% for FFOG and -23.7% for WINN. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.95. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FFOG charges 0.41% per year while WINN charges 0.57%. On a $10,000 position that is $41 vs $57 annually, a gap of $16 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FFOG currently yields 0.00% against 0.00% for WINN.
Holdings Overlap
76.5% of FFOG's money is in holdings WINN also owns. 71.2% of WINN's money is in holdings FFOG also owns.
Most of FFOG is already inside WINN. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
24 positions in common, counted across the 41 positions we hold weights for in FFOG and 74 in WINN, against full books of 43 and 146.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 47 positions for WINN that do not appear in our book for FFOG (27.9% of the fund), and 10 for FFOG that do not appear in WINN (13.2%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in FFOG | Weight in WINN | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 10.05% | 11.75% | 1.70% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc | 7.96% | 8.02% | 0.06% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 8.49% | 4.82% | 3.67% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 5.50% | 7.51% | 2.01% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 3.90% | 6.21% | 2.31% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 4.98% | 3.89% | 1.09% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 3.45% | 5.40% | 1.95% |
| AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc | 2.79% | 3.64% | 0.85% |
| LLYEli Lilly & Co. | 2.01% | 3.61% | 1.60% |
| MAMastercard Inc | 2.62% | 2.66% | 0.04% |
76.5% of FFOG is already inside WINN.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FFOG or WINN?
FFOG has an expense ratio of 0.41% while WINN charges 0.57%. FFOG is the cheaper option, by $16 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, FFOG or WINN?
Over the past year FFOG returned +7.46% vs +11.42% for WINN, so WINN leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, FFOG or WINN?
FFOG has been the more volatile fund at 20.1% annualized versus 16.4% for WINN. Worst drawdown: FFOG -25.4% vs WINN -23.7%.
Should I hold both FFOG and WINN?
FFOG and WINN have a monthly-return correlation of 0.95, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between FFOG and WINN?
76.5% of FFOG's money is in holdings WINN also owns. 71.2% of WINN's is in holdings FFOG also owns. They hold 24 positions in common, counted across the 41 positions we hold weights for in FFOG and 74 in WINN.
Which pays a higher dividend, FFOG or WINN?
FFOG yields 0.00% while WINN yields 0.00%, so WINN currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is WINN better than FFOG?
FFOG has a lower expense ratio. FFOG led over 3Y and the full window, WINN over 1Y. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.95. FFOG is less concentrated, with 55.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 57.5%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.