FGSI vs NUDG
FT Vest Growth Strength & Target Income ETF vs Nuveen Dividend Growth Fund ETF
Which is better, FGSI or NUDG?
NUDG has been ahead.
NUDG has a lower expense ratio. NUDG led over 1Y. FGSI is less concentrated, with 24.2% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 42.3%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FGSI | NUDG |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.85% | 0.61%Best |
| AUM | $2M | $6.2B |
| Dividend Yield | 8.42% | 0.50% |
| Holdings | 104 | 43 |
| YTD Return | +8.87%Best | +3.09% |
| 1Y Return | +5.98% | - |
| Top 10 Weight | 24.2%Best | 42.3% |
| Fund Family | First Trust Portfolios (US) | Nuveen |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jun 25, 2025 | Jun 2, 2026 |
Not shown on this pair: 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized), Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
FGSI vs NUDG growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
FGSI vs NUDG Performance
FT Vest Growth Strength & Target Income ETF (FGSI) is an ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US) and Nuveen Dividend Growth Fund ETF (NUDG) is an ETF from Nuveen. Year to date, FGSI is up 8.87% versus a gain of 3.09% for NUDG.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FGSI charges 0.85% per year while NUDG charges 0.61%. On a $10,000 position that is $85 vs $61 annually, a gap of $24 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FGSI currently yields 8.42% against 0.50% for NUDG.
Holdings Overlap
14.2% of FGSI's money is in holdings NUDG also owns. 24.1% of NUDG's money is in holdings FGSI also owns.
NUDG and FGSI share little of their money.
7 positions in common, counted across the 50 positions we hold weights for in FGSI and 42 in NUDG, against full books of 104 and 43.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 34 positions for NUDG that do not appear in our book for FGSI (70.4% of the fund), and 43 for FGSI that do not appear in NUDG (85.2%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in FGSI | Weight in NUDG | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 2.57% | 7.67% | 5.10% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 1.87% | 5.11% | 3.24% |
| APHAmphenol Corp. Class A | 2.25% | 3.83% | 1.58% |
| MAMastercard Inc | 1.98% | 2.54% | 0.56% |
| TTTt Trane Technologies Plc | 1.94% | 1.93% | 0.01% |
| MMCMarsh & Mclennan Cos Inc Common Stock Usd 1 | 1.82% | 1.61% | 0.21% |
| NOCNorthrop Grumman Corp. | 1.78% | 1.43% | 0.35% |
24.1% of NUDG is already inside FGSI.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FGSI or NUDG?
FGSI has an expense ratio of 0.85% while NUDG charges 0.61%. NUDG is the cheaper option, by $24 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between FGSI and NUDG?
24.1% of NUDG's money is in holdings FGSI also owns. 24.1% of NUDG's is in holdings FGSI also owns. They hold 7 positions in common, counted across the 50 positions we hold weights for in FGSI and 42 in NUDG.
Which pays a higher dividend, FGSI or NUDG?
FGSI yields 8.42% while NUDG yields 0.50%, so FGSI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is NUDG better than FGSI?
NUDG has a lower expense ratio. NUDG led over 1Y. FGSI is less concentrated, with 24.2% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 42.3%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.