FIAT vs PJAN

FIAT vs PJAN

Which is better, FIAT or PJAN?

Each has led over a different period.

PJAN has a lower expense ratio. FIAT led over 1Y, PJAN over the full window.

Lower Fees: PJANHigher Returns: split

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricFIATPJAN
Expense Ratio1.05%0.79%Best
AUM$30M$1.4B
Dividend Yield122.18%0.00%
Holdings1518
YTD Return+4.11%+8.58%Best
1Y Return+35.51%Best+11.69%
3Y Return (annualized)-+13.07%
5Y Return (annualized)-+9.18%
Volatility (annualized)55.0%5.4%Best
Max Drawdown-70.5%-10.5%Best
$10,000 over 2.3 years$5,438$12,618Best
Fund FamilyYieldMax ETFInnovator ETFs Trust
CategoryAlternativeAlternative
StyleOption WritingOption Writing
InceptionJul 9, 2024Dec 31, 2018

Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.

Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.3 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jul 10, 2024 to Oct 14, 2026 (2.3 years).

FIAT vs PJAN growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2.3 years both funds cover.

Compare FIAT against instead:FIAT vs SPYFIAT vs QQQFIAT vs VOOFIAT vs VTIPJAN against:PJAN vs VXUS

FIAT vs PJAN Performance

YieldMax Short COIN Option Income Strategy ETF (FIAT) is an ETF from YieldMax ETF and Innovator US Equity Power Buffer ETF - January (PJAN) is an ETF from Innovator ETFs Trust. Over the past year FIAT returned +35.51% while PJAN returned +11.69%. Year to date, FIAT is up 4.11% versus a gain of 8.58% for PJAN.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

FIAT has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 55.0% compared with 5.4% for PJAN. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -70.5% for FIAT and -10.5% for PJAN. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.44. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.

Fees and Cost Over Time

FIAT charges 1.05% per year while PJAN charges 0.79%. On a $10,000 position that is $105 vs $79 annually, a gap of $26 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FIAT currently yields 122.18% against 0.00% for PJAN.

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of FIAT and PJAN you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

FIATPJAN

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, FIAT or PJAN?

FIAT has an expense ratio of 1.05% while PJAN charges 0.79%. PJAN is the cheaper option, by $26 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, FIAT or PJAN?

Over the past year FIAT returned +35.51% vs +11.69% for PJAN, so FIAT leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), FIAT annualized -23.27% vs +10.64% for PJAN. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, FIAT or PJAN?

FIAT has been the more volatile fund at 55.0% annualized versus 5.4% for PJAN. Worst drawdown: FIAT -70.5% vs PJAN -10.5%.

Should I hold both FIAT and PJAN?

FIAT and PJAN have a monthly-return correlation of -0.44, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which pays a higher dividend, FIAT or PJAN?

FIAT yields 122.18% while PJAN yields 0.00%, so FIAT currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is PJAN better than FIAT?

PJAN has a lower expense ratio. FIAT led over 1Y, PJAN over the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.