FIIG vs JSI
First Trust Intermediate Duration Investment Grade Corporate ETF vs Janus Henderson Securitized Income ETF
Which is better, FIIG or JSI?
JSI has been ahead.
FIIG has a lower expense ratio. JSI led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FIIG | JSI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.49%Best | 0.50% |
| AUM | $628M | $1.5B |
| Dividend Yield | 5.26% | 6.59% |
| Holdings | 471 | 588 |
| YTD Return | -3.13% | +0.23%Best |
| 1Y Return | -3.25% | +1.50%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +5.42% | +6.02%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 5.3% | 2.7%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -5.2% | -2.3%Best |
| $10,000 over 2.9 years | $11,529 | $11,847Best |
| Fund Family | First Trust Portfolios (US) | Janus Henderson Investors |
| Category | Fixed Income | Fixed Income |
| Inception | Aug 2, 2023 | Nov 8, 2023 |
Not shown on this pair: 5Y Return (annualized), Top 10 Weight, Style.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.9 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Nov 9, 2023 to Oct 14, 2026 (2.9 years).
FIIG vs JSI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2.9 years both funds cover.
FIIG vs JSI Performance
First Trust Intermediate Duration Investment Grade Corporate ETF (FIIG) is an ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US) and Janus Henderson Securitized Income ETF (JSI) is an ETF from Janus Henderson Investors. Over the past year FIIG returned -3.25% while JSI returned +1.50%. Year to date, FIIG is down 3.13% versus a gain of 0.23% for JSI.
Over three years, FIIG compounded at +5.42% per year against +6.02% for JSI.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
FIIG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 5.3% compared with 2.7% for JSI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -5.2% for FIIG and -2.3% for JSI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.87. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FIIG charges 0.49% per year while JSI charges 0.50%. On a $10,000 position that is $49 vs $50 annually, a gap of $1 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FIIG currently yields 5.26% against 6.59% for JSI.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of FIIG and JSI you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FIIG or JSI?
FIIG has an expense ratio of 0.49% while JSI charges 0.50%. FIIG is the cheaper option, by $1 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, FIIG or JSI?
Over the past year FIIG returned -3.25% vs +1.50% for JSI, so JSI leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, FIIG or JSI?
FIIG has been the more volatile fund at 5.3% annualized versus 2.7% for JSI. Worst drawdown: FIIG -5.2% vs JSI -2.3%.
Should I hold both FIIG and JSI?
FIIG and JSI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.87, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, FIIG or JSI?
FIIG yields 5.26% while JSI yields 6.59%, so JSI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is JSI better than FIIG?
FIIG has a lower expense ratio. JSI led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.