FJAN vs METD

FJAN vs METD

Which is better, FJAN or METD?

Opposite sides of the same exposure.

FJAN has a lower expense ratio. FJAN led over 1Y and the full window. The two move opposite each other, correlation -0.56, so holding both offsets the exposure while paying both fees.

Lower Fees: FJANHigher Returns: FJAN

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricFJANMETD
Expense Ratio0.85%Best1.02%
AUM$1.5B$11M
Dividend Yield0.00%2.82%
Holdings1016
YTD Return+9.94%Best-20.74%
1Y Return+13.94%Best-14.38%
3Y Return (annualized)+15.36%-
5Y Return (annualized)+11.20%-
Volatility (annualized)6.8%Best32.0%
Max Drawdown-12.9%Best-50.6%
$10,000 over 2.4 years$13,341Best$5,539
Fund FamilyFirst Trust Portfolios (US)Direxion Shares ETF Trust
CategoryAlternativeAlternative
StyleMulti AlternativeMulti Alternative
InceptionJan 15, 2021Jun 5, 2024

Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.

Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.4 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jun 5, 2024 to Oct 14, 2026 (2.4 years).

FJAN vs METD growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2.4 years both funds cover.

Compare FJAN against instead:FJAN vs SPYFJAN vs QQQFJAN vs VOOFJAN vs VTIMETD against:METD vs VXUS

FJAN vs METD Performance

FT Vest US Equity Buffer ETF - January (FJAN) is an ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US) and Direxion Daily META Bear 1X ETF (METD) is an ETF from Direxion Shares ETF Trust. Over the past year FJAN returned +13.94% while METD returned -14.38%. Year to date, FJAN is up 9.94% versus a loss of 20.74% for METD.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

METD has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 32.0% compared with 6.8% for FJAN. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -12.9% for FJAN and -50.6% for METD. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.56. They move opposite each other. Holding both offsets the exposure rather than spreading it, while paying both funds' fees.

Fees and Cost Over Time

FJAN charges 0.85% per year while METD charges 1.02%. On a $10,000 position that is $85 vs $102 annually, a gap of $17 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FJAN currently yields 0.00% against 2.82% for METD.

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of FJAN and METD you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

FJANMETD

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, FJAN or METD?

FJAN has an expense ratio of 0.85% while METD charges 1.02%. FJAN is the cheaper option, by $17 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, FJAN or METD?

Over the past year FJAN returned +13.94% vs -14.38% for METD, so FJAN leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), FJAN annualized +12.76% vs -21.82% for METD. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, FJAN or METD?

METD has been the more volatile fund at 32.0% annualized versus 6.8% for FJAN. Worst drawdown: FJAN -12.9% vs METD -50.6%.

Should I hold both FJAN and METD?

FJAN and METD have a monthly-return correlation of -0.56, so they move opposite each other. Holding both offsets the exposure rather than spreading it, and pays both funds' fees on the way. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which pays a higher dividend, FJAN or METD?

FJAN yields 0.00% while METD yields 2.82%, so METD currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is METD better than FJAN?

FJAN has a lower expense ratio. FJAN led over 1Y and the full window. The two move opposite each other, correlation -0.56, so holding both offsets the exposure while paying both fees. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.