FJUL vs XDEC

FJUL vs XDEC

Which is better, FJUL or XDEC?

FJUL has been ahead.

FJUL led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.91.

Lower Fees: TiedHigher Returns: FJUL

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricFJULXDEC
Expense Ratio0.85%Tie0.85%Tie
AUM$1.4B$208M
Dividend Yield0.00%0.00%
Holdings1012
YTD Return+10.19%Best+7.41%
1Y Return+13.14%Best+9.79%
3Y Return (annualized)+16.61%Best+9.84%
5Y Return (annualized)+11.81%-
Volatility (annualized)10.3%6.8%Best
Max Drawdown-13.1%-11.8%Best
$10,000 over 4.8 years$17,206Best$14,533
Fund FamilyFirst Trust Portfolios (US)First Trust Portfolios (US)
CategoryAlternativeAlternative
StyleOption WritingOption Writing
InceptionJul 16, 2020Dec 17, 2021

Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.

Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 4.8 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Dec 20, 2021 to Oct 14, 2026 (4.8 years).

FJUL vs XDEC growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 4.8 years both funds cover.

Compare FJUL against instead:FJUL vs SPYFJUL vs QQQFJUL vs VOOFJUL vs VTIXDEC against:XDEC vs VXUS

FJUL vs XDEC Performance

FT Vest US Equity Buffer ETF - July (FJUL) is an ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US) and FT Vest US Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - December (XDEC) is an ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US). Over the past year FJUL returned +13.14% while XDEC returned +9.79%. Year to date, FJUL is up 10.19% versus a gain of 7.41% for XDEC.

Over three years, FJUL compounded at +16.61% per year against +9.84% for XDEC.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

FJUL has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 10.3% compared with 6.8% for XDEC. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -13.1% for FJUL and -11.8% for XDEC. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.91. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.

Fees and Cost Over Time

FJUL charges 0.85% per year while XDEC charges 0.85%. On a $10,000 position that is $85 vs $85 annually. On income, FJUL currently yields 0.00% against 0.00% for XDEC.

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of FJUL and XDEC you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

FJULXDEC

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, FJUL or XDEC?

FJUL has an expense ratio of 0.85% while XDEC charges 0.85%. At the precision these are quoted to, they cost the same.

Which performed better, FJUL or XDEC?

Over the past year FJUL returned +13.14% vs +9.79% for XDEC, so FJUL leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, FJUL or XDEC?

FJUL has been the more volatile fund at 10.3% annualized versus 6.8% for XDEC. Worst drawdown: FJUL -13.1% vs XDEC -11.8%.

Should I hold both FJUL and XDEC?

FJUL and XDEC have a monthly-return correlation of 0.91, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which pays a higher dividend, FJUL or XDEC?

FJUL yields 0.00% while XDEC yields 0.00%, so XDEC currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is XDEC better than FJUL?

FJUL led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.91. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.