FJUN vs NOVM

FJUN vs NOVM

Which is better, FJUN or NOVM?

FJUN has been ahead.

FJUN led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.95.

Lower Fees: TiedHigher Returns: FJUN

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricFJUNNOVM
Expense Ratio0.85%Tie0.85%Tie
AUM$1.4B$27M
Dividend Yield0.00%0.00%
Holdings1010
YTD Return+7.70%Best+4.49%
1Y Return+10.40%Best+6.65%
3Y Return (annualized)+14.32%-
5Y Return (annualized)+10.80%-
Volatility (annualized)6.8%2.6%Best
Max Drawdown-13.3%-3.3%Best
$10,000 over 1.9 years$11,994Best$11,263
Fund FamilyFirst Trust Portfolios (US)First Trust Portfolios (US)
CategoryAlternativeAlternative
StyleOption WritingOption Writing
InceptionJun 19, 2020Nov 15, 2024

Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.

Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.9 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Nov 18, 2024 to Oct 14, 2026 (1.9 years).

FJUN vs NOVM growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.9 years both funds cover.

Compare FJUN against instead:FJUN vs SPYFJUN vs QQQFJUN vs VOOFJUN vs VTINOVM against:NOVM vs VXUS

FJUN vs NOVM Performance

FT Vest US Equity Buffer ETF - June (FJUN) is an ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US) and FT Vest US Equity Max Buffer ETF - November (NOVM) is an ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US). Over the past year FJUN returned +10.40% while NOVM returned +6.65%. Year to date, FJUN is up 7.70% versus a gain of 4.49% for NOVM.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

FJUN has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 6.8% compared with 2.6% for NOVM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -13.3% for FJUN and -3.3% for NOVM. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.95. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.

Fees and Cost Over Time

FJUN charges 0.85% per year while NOVM charges 0.85%. On a $10,000 position that is $85 vs $85 annually. On income, FJUN currently yields 0.00% against 0.00% for NOVM.

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of FJUN and NOVM you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

FJUNNOVM

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, FJUN or NOVM?

FJUN has an expense ratio of 0.85% while NOVM charges 0.85%. At the precision these are quoted to, they cost the same.

Which performed better, FJUN or NOVM?

Over the past year FJUN returned +10.40% vs +6.65% for NOVM, so FJUN leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), FJUN annualized +10.04% vs +6.46% for NOVM. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, FJUN or NOVM?

FJUN has been the more volatile fund at 6.8% annualized versus 2.6% for NOVM. Worst drawdown: FJUN -13.3% vs NOVM -3.3%.

Should I hold both FJUN and NOVM?

FJUN and NOVM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.95, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which pays a higher dividend, FJUN or NOVM?

FJUN yields 0.00% while NOVM yields 0.00%, so NOVM currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is NOVM better than FJUN?

FJUN led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.95. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.