FJUN vs XJAN
FT Vest US Equity Buffer ETF - June vs FT Vest US Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - January
Which is better, FJUN or XJAN?
FJUN has been ahead.
FJUN led over 1Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FJUN | XJAN |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.85%Tie | 0.85%Tie |
| AUM | $1.4B | $71M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Holdings | 10 | 12 |
| YTD Return | +7.70%Best | +7.00% |
| 1Y Return | +10.40%Best | +9.59% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +14.32% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +10.80% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 6.6% | 4.3%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -13.3% | -10.0%Best |
| $10,000 over 2.7 years | $13,731Best | $12,717 |
| Fund Family | First Trust Portfolios (US) | First Trust Portfolios (US) |
| Category | Alternative | Alternative |
| Style | Option Writing | Option Writing |
| Inception | Jun 19, 2020 | Jan 22, 2024 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.7 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jan 22, 2024 to Oct 14, 2026 (2.7 years).
FJUN vs XJAN growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2.7 years both funds cover.
FJUN vs XJAN Performance
FT Vest US Equity Buffer ETF - June (FJUN) is an ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US) and FT Vest US Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - January (XJAN) is an ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US). Over the past year FJUN returned +10.40% while XJAN returned +9.59%. Year to date, FJUN is up 7.70% versus a gain of 7.00% for XJAN.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
FJUN has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 6.6% compared with 4.3% for XJAN. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -13.3% for FJUN and -10.0% for XJAN. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.89. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FJUN charges 0.85% per year while XJAN charges 0.85%. On a $10,000 position that is $85 vs $85 annually. On income, FJUN currently yields 0.00% against 0.00% for XJAN.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of FJUN and XJAN you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FJUN or XJAN?
FJUN has an expense ratio of 0.85% while XJAN charges 0.85%. At the precision these are quoted to, they cost the same.
Which performed better, FJUN or XJAN?
Over the past year FJUN returned +10.40% vs +9.59% for XJAN, so FJUN leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, FJUN or XJAN?
FJUN has been the more volatile fund at 6.6% annualized versus 4.3% for XJAN. Worst drawdown: FJUN -13.3% vs XJAN -10.0%.
Should I hold both FJUN and XJAN?
FJUN and XJAN have a monthly-return correlation of 0.89, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, FJUN or XJAN?
FJUN yields 0.00% while XJAN yields 0.00%, so XJAN currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is XJAN better than FJUN?
FJUN led over 1Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.