FLCB vs RSBT

FLCB vs RSBT

Which is better, FLCB or RSBT?

Each has led over a different period.

FLCB has a lower expense ratio. FLCB led over 3Y and the full window, RSBT over 1Y.

Lower Fees: FLCBHigher Returns: split

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricFLCBRSBT
Expense Ratio0.15%Best1.01%
AUM$3.1B$165M
Dividend Yield4.50%2.95%
Holdings64234
YTD Return-2.14%+8.40%Best
1Y Return-2.11%+8.40%Best
3Y Return (annualized)+4.58%Best+4.37%
5Y Return (annualized)-0.62%-
Volatility (annualized)5.5%Best11.2%
Max Drawdown-7.3%Best-23.6%
$10,000 over 3.7 years$10,957Best$10,019
Fund FamilyFranklin Templeton Investments (US)Return Stacked ETF
CategoryFixed IncomeFixed Income
InceptionSep 17, 2019Feb 7, 2023

Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight, Style.

Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 3.7 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Feb 8, 2023 to Oct 14, 2026 (3.7 years).

FLCB vs RSBT growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 3.7 years both funds cover.

Compare FLCB against instead:FLCB vs SPYFLCB vs QQQFLCB vs VOOFLCB vs VTIRSBT against:RSBT vs VXUS

FLCB vs RSBT Performance

Franklin US Core Bond ETF (FLCB) is an ETF from Franklin Templeton Investments (US) and Return Stacked Bonds & Managed Futures ETF (RSBT) is an ETF from Return Stacked ETF. Over the past year FLCB returned -2.11% while RSBT returned +8.40%. Year to date, FLCB is down 2.14% versus a gain of 8.40% for RSBT.

Over three years, FLCB compounded at +4.58% per year against +4.37% for RSBT. Across the full 4-year window we track, FLCB has the edge at +2.50% annualized vs +0.05%.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

RSBT has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 11.2% compared with 5.5% for FLCB. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -7.3% for FLCB and -23.6% for RSBT. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.22. They move largely independently of each other.

Fees and Cost Over Time

FLCB charges 0.15% per year while RSBT charges 1.01%. On a $10,000 position that is $15 vs $101 annually, a gap of $86 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FLCB currently yields 4.50% against 2.95% for RSBT.

Holdings Overlap

We hold position weights for 342 holdings in FLCB and 2 in RSBT, totalling 61.0% and 90.7% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.

0 positions in common, counted across the 342 positions we hold weights for in FLCB and 2 in RSBT, against full books of 642 and 34.

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of FLCB and RSBT you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

FLCBRSBT

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, FLCB or RSBT?

FLCB has an expense ratio of 0.15% while RSBT charges 1.01%. FLCB is the cheaper option, by $86 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, FLCB or RSBT?

Over the past year FLCB returned -2.11% vs +8.40% for RSBT, so RSBT leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), FLCB annualized +2.50% vs +0.05% for RSBT. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, FLCB or RSBT?

RSBT has been the more volatile fund at 11.2% annualized versus 5.5% for FLCB. Worst drawdown: FLCB -7.3% vs RSBT -23.6%.

Should I hold both FLCB and RSBT?

FLCB and RSBT have a monthly-return correlation of 0.22, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which pays a higher dividend, FLCB or RSBT?

FLCB yields 4.50% while RSBT yields 2.95%, so FLCB currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is RSBT better than FLCB?

FLCB has a lower expense ratio. FLCB led over 3Y and the full window, RSBT over 1Y. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.