FLCG vs LSGR
Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Growth ETF vs Natixis Loomis Sayles Focused Growth ETF
Which is better, FLCG or LSGR?
Nearly the same fund. FLCG costs less.
FLCG has a lower expense ratio. FLCG led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.96. FLCG is less concentrated, with 56.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 76.0%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FLCG | LSGR |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.39%Best | 0.59% |
| AUM | $687M | $929M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.04% | 0.00% |
| Holdings | 208 | 44 |
| YTD Return | +7.29%Best | +2.25% |
| 1Y Return | +9.89%Best | +3.06% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.65% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.3%Best | 17.5% |
| Max Drawdown | -22.9%Tie | -22.9%Tie |
| $10,000 over 2.2 years | $14,083Best | $13,532 |
| Top 10 Weight | 56.5%Best | 76.0% |
| Fund Family | Federated Hermes | Natixis Funds |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Jul 30, 2024 | Jun 29, 2023 |
Not shown on this pair: 5Y Return (annualized).
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.2 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jul 31, 2024 to Oct 14, 2026 (2.2 years).
FLCG vs LSGR growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2.2 years both funds cover.
FLCG vs LSGR Performance
Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Growth ETF (FLCG) is an ETF from Federated Hermes and Natixis Loomis Sayles Focused Growth ETF (LSGR) is an ETF from Natixis Funds. Over the past year FLCG returned +9.89% while LSGR returned +3.06%. Year to date, FLCG is up 7.29% versus a gain of 2.25% for LSGR.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
LSGR has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 17.5% compared with 15.3% for FLCG. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -22.9% for FLCG and -22.9% for LSGR. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.96. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FLCG charges 0.39% per year while LSGR charges 0.59%. On a $10,000 position that is $39 vs $59 annually, a gap of $20 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FLCG currently yields 0.04% against 0.00% for LSGR.
Holdings Overlap
39.6% of FLCG's money is in holdings LSGR also owns. 73.8% of LSGR's money is in holdings FLCG also owns.
Most of LSGR is already inside FLCG. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
12 positions in common, counted across the 100 positions we hold weights for in FLCG and 21 in LSGR, against full books of 208 and 44.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 9 positions for LSGR that do not appear in our book for FLCG (25.7% of the fund), and 84 for FLCG that do not appear in LSGR (59.6%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in FLCG | Weight in LSGR | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 15.20% | 18.76% | 3.56% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc | 11.70% | 11.66% | 0.04% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 2.88% | 9.04% | 6.16% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 4.54% | 6.07% | 1.53% |
| TSLATesla Inc | 3.00% | 6.14% | 3.14% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 0.61% | 7.62% | 7.01% |
| NFLXNetflix, Inc. | 0.93% | 3.38% | 2.45% |
| ORCLOracle Corp - Common | 0.05% | 3.11% | 3.06% |
| ADSKAutodesk, Inc. | 0.03% | 3.10% | 3.07% |
| REGNRegeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. | 0.69% | 2.02% | 1.33% |
73.8% of LSGR is already inside FLCG.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FLCG or LSGR?
FLCG has an expense ratio of 0.39% while LSGR charges 0.59%. FLCG is the cheaper option, by $20 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, FLCG or LSGR?
Over the past year FLCG returned +9.89% vs +3.06% for LSGR, so FLCG leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), FLCG annualized +16.84% vs +14.74% for LSGR. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, FLCG or LSGR?
LSGR has been the more volatile fund at 17.5% annualized versus 15.3% for FLCG. Worst drawdown: FLCG -22.9% vs LSGR -22.9%.
Should I hold both FLCG and LSGR?
FLCG and LSGR have a monthly-return correlation of 0.96, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between FLCG and LSGR?
73.8% of LSGR's money is in holdings FLCG also owns. 73.8% of LSGR's is in holdings FLCG also owns. They hold 12 positions in common, counted across the 100 positions we hold weights for in FLCG and 21 in LSGR.
Which pays a higher dividend, FLCG or LSGR?
FLCG yields 0.04% while LSGR yields 0.00%, so FLCG currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is LSGR better than FLCG?
FLCG has a lower expense ratio. FLCG led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.96. FLCG is less concentrated, with 56.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 76.0%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.