FLCG vs REGS

FLCG vs REGS

Which is better, FLCG or REGS?

REGS has been ahead.

REGS has a lower expense ratio. REGS led over 1Y. REGS is less concentrated, with 51.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 56.5%.

Lower Fees: REGSHigher Returns (1Y): REGSLess Concentrated: REGS

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricFLCGREGS
Expense Ratio0.39%0.35%Best
AUM$687M$77M
Dividend Yield0.04%0.00%
Holdings208124
YTD Return+7.29%+13.80%Best
1Y Return+9.89%-
Top 10 Weight56.5%51.6%Best
Fund FamilyFederated HermesColumbia Threadneedle Investments
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap GrowthLarge Cap Growth
InceptionJul 30, 2024Mar 16, 2026

Not shown on this pair: 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized), Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.

FLCG vs REGS growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

Compare FLCG against instead:FLCG vs SPYFLCG vs QQQFLCG vs VOOFLCG vs VTIREGS against:REGS vs VXUS

FLCG vs REGS Performance

Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Growth ETF (FLCG) is an ETF from Federated Hermes and Columbia Large Cap Growth ETF (REGS) is an ETF from Columbia Threadneedle Investments. Year to date, FLCG is up 7.29% versus a gain of 13.80% for REGS.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

FLCG charges 0.39% per year while REGS charges 0.35%. On a $10,000 position that is $39 vs $35 annually, a gap of $4 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FLCG currently yields 0.04% against 0.00% for REGS.

Holdings Overlap

FLCG already in REGS63.0%
REGS already in FLCG63.3%

63.0% of FLCG's money is in holdings REGS also owns. 63.3% of REGS's money is in holdings FLCG also owns.

The two portfolios partly overlap.

21 positions in common, counted across the 100 positions we hold weights for in FLCG and 55 in REGS, against full books of 208 and 124.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 32 positions for REGS that do not appear in our book for FLCG (33.7% of the fund), and 74 for FLCG that do not appear in REGS (36.3%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in FLCGWeight in REGSDifference
NVDANvidia Corp15.20%10.73%4.47%
AAPLApple, Inc7.97%7.36%0.61%
GOOGLAlphabet Inc11.70%1.55%10.15%
MSFTMicrosoft Corp4.54%4.97%0.43%
AVGOBroadcom Inc3.10%5.23%2.13%
METAMeta Platforms Inc2.88%4.70%1.82%
MUMicron Technology, Inc.2.76%4.51%1.75%
LLYEli Lilly & Co.2.37%3.89%1.52%
ANETArista Networks Inc Common Stock2.58%2.16%0.42%
AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc1.26%3.44%2.18%

63.3% of REGS is already inside FLCG.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

FLCGREGS

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, FLCG or REGS?

FLCG has an expense ratio of 0.39% while REGS charges 0.35%. REGS is the cheaper option, by $4 a year on a $10,000 investment.

What is the holdings overlap between FLCG and REGS?

63.3% of REGS's money is in holdings FLCG also owns. 63.3% of REGS's is in holdings FLCG also owns. They hold 21 positions in common, counted across the 100 positions we hold weights for in FLCG and 55 in REGS.

Which pays a higher dividend, FLCG or REGS?

FLCG yields 0.04% while REGS yields 0.00%, so FLCG currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is REGS better than FLCG?

REGS has a lower expense ratio. REGS led over 1Y. REGS is less concentrated, with 51.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 56.5%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.