FLCG vs TFGZ
Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Growth ETF vs Thornburg Focus Growth Fund ETF
Which is better, FLCG or TFGZ?
TFGZ has been ahead.
FLCG has a lower expense ratio. TFGZ led over 1Y. TFGZ is less concentrated, with 49.4% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 56.5%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FLCG | TFGZ |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.39%Best | 0.79% |
| AUM | $687M | $12M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.04% | 0.00% |
| Holdings | 208 | 43 |
| YTD Return | +7.29% | +16.33%Best |
| 1Y Return | +9.89% | - |
| Top 10 Weight | 56.5% | 49.4%Best |
| Fund Family | Federated Hermes | Thornburg Investment Management |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Jul 30, 2024 | Apr 1, 2026 |
Not shown on this pair: 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized), Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
FLCG vs TFGZ growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
FLCG vs TFGZ Performance
Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Growth ETF (FLCG) is an ETF from Federated Hermes and Thornburg Focus Growth Fund ETF (TFGZ) is an ETF from Thornburg Investment Management. Year to date, FLCG is up 7.29% versus a gain of 16.33% for TFGZ.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FLCG charges 0.39% per year while TFGZ charges 0.79%. On a $10,000 position that is $39 vs $79 annually, a gap of $40 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FLCG currently yields 0.04% against 0.00% for TFGZ.
Holdings Overlap
26.7% of FLCG's money is in holdings TFGZ also owns. 43.5% of TFGZ's money is in holdings FLCG also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
10 positions in common, counted across the 100 positions we hold weights for in FLCG and 42 in TFGZ, against full books of 208 and 43.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 24 positions for TFGZ that do not appear in our book for FLCG (41.5% of the fund), and 85 for FLCG that do not appear in TFGZ (72.5%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in FLCG | Weight in TFGZ | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc | 11.70% | 12.16% | 0.46% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 4.54% | 7.18% | 2.64% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 3.10% | 6.00% | 2.90% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 2.88% | 3.77% | 0.89% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 2.76% | 3.40% | 0.64% |
| LRCXLam Research Corp | 0.55% | 3.30% | 2.75% |
| VRTVertiv Holdings Co | 0.78% | 2.62% | 1.84% |
| DDOGDatadog Inc | 0.12% | 2.20% | 2.08% |
| LITELumentum Holdings Inc | 0.25% | 1.34% | 1.09% |
| RBRKRubrik Inc-A | 0.04% | 1.52% | 1.48% |
43.5% of TFGZ is already inside FLCG.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FLCG or TFGZ?
FLCG has an expense ratio of 0.39% while TFGZ charges 0.79%. FLCG is the cheaper option, by $40 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between FLCG and TFGZ?
43.5% of TFGZ's money is in holdings FLCG also owns. 43.5% of TFGZ's is in holdings FLCG also owns. They hold 10 positions in common, counted across the 100 positions we hold weights for in FLCG and 42 in TFGZ.
Which pays a higher dividend, FLCG or TFGZ?
FLCG yields 0.04% while TFGZ yields 0.00%, so FLCG currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is TFGZ better than FLCG?
FLCG has a lower expense ratio. TFGZ led over 1Y. TFGZ is less concentrated, with 49.4% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 56.5%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.