FLCG vs XOVR
Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Growth ETF vs ERShares Private-Public Crossover ETF
Which is better, FLCG or XOVR?
FLCG has been ahead.
FLCG has a lower expense ratio. FLCG led over 1Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FLCG | XOVR |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.39%Best | 1.81% |
| AUM | $687M | $1.5B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.04% | 0.00% |
| Holdings | 208 | 33 |
| YTD Return | +7.29%Best | +6.41% |
| 1Y Return | +9.89%Best | +1.58% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +22.10% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +5.66% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.3%Best | 23.1% |
| Max Drawdown | -22.9%Best | -25.2% |
| $10,000 over 2.2 years | $14,083Best | $14,036 |
| Fund Family | Federated Hermes | ERShares |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Jul 30, 2024 | Nov 7, 2017 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.2 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jul 31, 2024 to Oct 14, 2026 (2.2 years).
FLCG vs XOVR growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2.2 years both funds cover.
FLCG vs XOVR Performance
Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Growth ETF (FLCG) is an ETF from Federated Hermes and ERShares Private-Public Crossover ETF (XOVR) is an ETF from ERShares. Over the past year FLCG returned +9.89% while XOVR returned +1.58%. Year to date, FLCG is up 7.29% versus a gain of 6.41% for XOVR.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
XOVR has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 23.1% compared with 15.3% for FLCG. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -22.9% for FLCG and -25.2% for XOVR. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.78. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FLCG charges 0.39% per year while XOVR charges 1.81%. On a $10,000 position that is $39 vs $181 annually, a gap of $142 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FLCG currently yields 0.04% against 0.00% for XOVR.
Holdings Overlap
At least 38.5% of FLCG's money is in holdings XOVR also owns.
Stated as a floor: for XOVR, our book for it covers 77.3% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
9 positions in common, counted across the 100 positions we hold weights for in FLCG and 30 in XOVR, against full books of 208 and 33.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in FLCG | Weight in XOVR | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 15.20% | 9.73% | 5.47% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc | 11.70% | 5.74% | 5.96% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 2.88% | 4.78% | 1.90% |
| ANETArista Networks Inc Common Stock | 2.58% | 2.97% | 0.39% |
| FTNTFortinet Inc | 1.91% | 3.33% | 1.42% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 2.76% | 1.70% | 1.06% |
| VEEVVeeva Systems Inc | 0.67% | 3.64% | 2.97% |
| NTRANatera Inc | 0.08% | 2.95% | 2.87% |
| PLTRPalantir Technologies Inc | 0.68% | 1.19% | 0.51% |
38.5% of FLCG is already inside XOVR.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FLCG or XOVR?
FLCG has an expense ratio of 0.39% while XOVR charges 1.81%. FLCG is the cheaper option, by $142 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, FLCG or XOVR?
Over the past year FLCG returned +9.89% vs +1.58% for XOVR, so FLCG leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), FLCG annualized +16.84% vs +16.66% for XOVR. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, FLCG or XOVR?
XOVR has been the more volatile fund at 23.1% annualized versus 15.3% for FLCG. Worst drawdown: FLCG -22.9% vs XOVR -25.2%.
Should I hold both FLCG and XOVR?
FLCG and XOVR have a monthly-return correlation of 0.78, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between FLCG and XOVR?
At least 38.5% of FLCG's money is in holdings XOVR also owns. Our book for XOVR is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 9 positions in common, counted across the 100 positions we hold weights for in FLCG and 30 in XOVR.
Which pays a higher dividend, FLCG or XOVR?
FLCG yields 0.04% while XOVR yields 0.00%, so FLCG currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is XOVR better than FLCG?
FLCG has a lower expense ratio. FLCG led over 1Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.