FLCV vs JDVL

FLCV vs JDVL

Which is better, FLCV or JDVL?

Each has led over a different period.

FLCV has a lower expense ratio. FLCV led over 1Y, JDVL over the full window. FLCV is less concentrated, with 31.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 40.0%.

Lower Fees: FLCVHigher Returns: splitLess Concentrated: FLCV

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricFLCVJDVL
Expense Ratio0.32%Best0.56%
AUM$211M$948M
Dividend Yield0.72%1.48%
Holdings25241
YTD Return+18.52%Best+15.90%
1Y Return+23.69%Best+21.37%
Volatility (annualized)10.7%Best12.2%
Max Drawdown-5.7%Best-9.2%
$10,000 over 1.2 years$12,593$12,918Best
Top 10 Weight31.0%Best40.0%
Fund FamilyFederated HermesJohn Hancock Investment Management
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap ValueLarge Cap Value
InceptionJul 30, 2024Aug 6, 2025

Not shown on this pair: 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized).

Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.2 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Aug 6, 2025 to Oct 14, 2026 (1.2 years).

FLCV vs JDVL growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.2 years both funds cover.

Compare FLCV against instead:FLCV vs SPYFLCV vs QQQFLCV vs VOOFLCV vs VTIJDVL against:JDVL vs VXUS

FLCV vs JDVL Performance

Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Value ETF (FLCV) is an ETF from Federated Hermes and John Hancock Disciplined Value Select ETF (JDVL) is an ETF from John Hancock Investment Management. Over the past year FLCV returned +23.69% while JDVL returned +21.37%. Year to date, FLCV is up 18.52% versus a gain of 15.90% for JDVL.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

JDVL has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 12.2% compared with 10.7% for FLCV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -5.7% for FLCV and -9.2% for JDVL. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.83. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.

Fees and Cost Over Time

FLCV charges 0.32% per year while JDVL charges 0.56%. On a $10,000 position that is $32 vs $56 annually, a gap of $24 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FLCV currently yields 0.72% against 1.48% for JDVL.

Holdings Overlap

FLCV already in JDVL19.1%
JDVL already in FLCV35.9%

19.1% of FLCV's money is in holdings JDVL also owns. 35.9% of JDVL's money is in holdings FLCV also owns.

The two portfolios partly overlap.

11 positions in common, counted across the 126 positions we hold weights for in FLCV and 39 in JDVL, against full books of 252 and 41.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 25 positions for JDVL that do not appear in our book for FLCV (55.7% of the fund), and 115 for FLCV that do not appear in JDVL (81.0%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in FLCVWeight in JDVLDifference
AMZNAmazon.Com Inc5.80%7.48%1.68%
MSFTMicrosoft Corp4.38%5.77%1.39%
JPMJpmorgan Chase1.78%4.03%2.25%
ABBVAbbvie Inc.3.01%2.19%0.82%
GILDGilead Sciences1.25%2.77%1.52%
PMPhilip Morris International Inc.0.25%3.17%2.92%
MPCMarathon Petroleum Corp1.34%1.94%0.60%
MSMorgan Stanley0.59%2.65%2.06%
AMATApplied Materials, Inc.0.24%2.59%2.35%
UBERUber Technologies Inc0.14%2.12%1.98%

35.9% of JDVL is already inside FLCV.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

FLCVJDVL

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, FLCV or JDVL?

FLCV has an expense ratio of 0.32% while JDVL charges 0.56%. FLCV is the cheaper option, by $24 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, FLCV or JDVL?

Over the past year FLCV returned +23.69% vs +21.37% for JDVL, so FLCV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), FLCV annualized +21.18% vs +23.78% for JDVL. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, FLCV or JDVL?

JDVL has been the more volatile fund at 12.2% annualized versus 10.7% for FLCV. Worst drawdown: FLCV -5.7% vs JDVL -9.2%.

Should I hold both FLCV and JDVL?

FLCV and JDVL have a monthly-return correlation of 0.83, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.

What is the holdings overlap between FLCV and JDVL?

35.9% of JDVL's money is in holdings FLCV also owns. 35.9% of JDVL's is in holdings FLCV also owns. They hold 11 positions in common, counted across the 126 positions we hold weights for in FLCV and 39 in JDVL.

Which pays a higher dividend, FLCV or JDVL?

FLCV yields 0.72% while JDVL yields 1.48%, so JDVL currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is JDVL better than FLCV?

FLCV has a lower expense ratio. FLCV led over 1Y, JDVL over the full window. FLCV is less concentrated, with 31.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 40.0%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.