FLCV vs MAVF
Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Value ETF vs Matrix Advisors Value ETF
Which is better, FLCV or MAVF?
Each has led over a different period.
FLCV has a lower expense ratio. FLCV led over 1Y, MAVF over the full window. FLCV is less concentrated, with 31.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 54.6%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FLCV | MAVF |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.32%Best | 0.75% |
| AUM | $211M | $93M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.72% | 0.37% |
| Holdings | 252 | 29 |
| YTD Return | +18.52%Best | +13.01% |
| 1Y Return | +23.69%Best | +19.46% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 10.5%Best | 14.3% |
| Max Drawdown | -14.3%Best | -16.4% |
| $10,000 over 1.6 years | $13,092 | $13,491Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 31.0%Best | 54.6% |
| Fund Family | Federated Hermes | Matrix Asset Advisors |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Jul 30, 2024 | Sep 16, 1983 |
Not shown on this pair: 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized).
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.6 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Feb 24, 2025 to Oct 14, 2026 (1.6 years).
FLCV vs MAVF growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.6 years both funds cover.
FLCV vs MAVF Performance
Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Value ETF (FLCV) is an ETF from Federated Hermes and Matrix Advisors Value ETF (MAVF) is an ETF from Matrix Asset Advisors. Over the past year FLCV returned +23.69% while MAVF returned +19.46%. Year to date, FLCV is up 18.52% versus a gain of 13.01% for MAVF.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
MAVF has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.3% compared with 10.5% for FLCV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -14.3% for FLCV and -16.4% for MAVF. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.84. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FLCV charges 0.32% per year while MAVF charges 0.75%. On a $10,000 position that is $32 vs $75 annually, a gap of $43 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FLCV currently yields 0.72% against 0.37% for MAVF.
Holdings Overlap
25.4% of FLCV's money is in holdings MAVF also owns. 57.6% of MAVF's money is in holdings FLCV also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
15 positions in common, counted across the 126 positions we hold weights for in FLCV and 27 in MAVF, against full books of 252 and 29.
What only one of them owns
Measured across the 126 and 27 positions we hold weights for.
FLCV holds 111 positions MAVF does not, 74.7% of the fund.
Largest: ABBV 3.01%, INTU 2.07%, TRV 2.01%, COST 1.91%, STT 1.90%
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in FLCV | Weight in MAVF | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| AAPLApple, Inc | 6.28% | 7.06% | 0.78% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 4.38% | 8.61% | 4.23% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 5.80% | 6.38% | 0.58% |
| JPMJpmorgan Chase | 1.78% | 3.19% | 1.41% |
| GNRCGenerac Holdings, Inc. | 0.39% | 4.35% | 3.96% |
| QCOMQualcomm Inc. | 0.17% | 3.98% | 3.81% |
| PEPPepsico Inc. | 0.57% | 3.13% | 2.56% |
| PYPLPaypal Holdings Inc | 0.95% | 2.67% | 1.72% |
| BKBank Of New York Mellon Corp | 1.50% | 2.03% | 0.53% |
| AMATApplied Materials, Inc. | 0.24% | 3.27% | 3.03% |
57.6% of MAVF is already inside FLCV.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FLCV or MAVF?
FLCV has an expense ratio of 0.32% while MAVF charges 0.75%. FLCV is the cheaper option, by $43 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, FLCV or MAVF?
Over the past year FLCV returned +23.69% vs +19.46% for MAVF, so FLCV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), FLCV annualized +18.34% vs +20.58% for MAVF. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, FLCV or MAVF?
MAVF has been the more volatile fund at 14.3% annualized versus 10.5% for FLCV. Worst drawdown: FLCV -14.3% vs MAVF -16.4%.
Should I hold both FLCV and MAVF?
FLCV and MAVF have a monthly-return correlation of 0.84, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between FLCV and MAVF?
57.6% of MAVF's money is in holdings FLCV also owns. 57.6% of MAVF's is in holdings FLCV also owns. They hold 15 positions in common, counted across the 126 positions we hold weights for in FLCV and 27 in MAVF.
Which pays a higher dividend, FLCV or MAVF?
FLCV yields 0.72% while MAVF yields 0.37%, so FLCV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is MAVF better than FLCV?
FLCV has a lower expense ratio. FLCV led over 1Y, MAVF over the full window. FLCV is less concentrated, with 31.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 54.6%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.