FLQL vs SDVD
Franklin US Large Cap Multifactor Index ETF vs FT Vest SMID Rising Dividend Achievers Target Income ETF
Which is better, FLQL or SDVD?
FLQL has been ahead.
FLQL has a lower expense ratio. FLQL led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. SDVD is less concentrated, with 10.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.2%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FLQL | SDVD |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.15%Best | 0.85% |
| AUM | $2.2B | $872M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.06% | 8.68% |
| Holdings | 219 | 348 |
| YTD Return | +12.74%Best | +3.20% |
| 1Y Return | +16.39%Best | +6.25% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +22.41%Best | +13.58% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +14.06% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 12.8%Best | 22.2% |
| Max Drawdown | -19.3%Best | -29.1% |
| $10,000 over 3.2 years | $18,186Best | $11,057 |
| Top 10 Weight | 37.2% | 10.3%Best |
| Fund Family | Franklin Templeton Investments (US) | First Trust Portfolios (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Apr 26, 2017 | Aug 9, 2023 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 3.2 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Aug 10, 2023 to Oct 14, 2026 (3.2 years).
FLQL vs SDVD growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 3.2 years both funds cover.
FLQL vs SDVD Performance
Franklin US Large Cap Multifactor Index ETF (FLQL) is an ETF from Franklin Templeton Investments (US) and FT Vest SMID Rising Dividend Achievers Target Income ETF (SDVD) is an ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US). Over the past year FLQL returned +16.39% while SDVD returned +6.25%. Year to date, FLQL is up 12.74% versus a gain of 3.20% for SDVD.
Over three years, FLQL compounded at +22.41% per year against +13.58% for SDVD.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
SDVD has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 22.2% compared with 12.8% for FLQL. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -19.3% for FLQL and -29.1% for SDVD. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.66. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FLQL charges 0.15% per year while SDVD charges 0.85%. On a $10,000 position that is $15 vs $85 annually, a gap of $70 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FLQL currently yields 1.06% against 8.68% for SDVD.
Holdings Overlap
4.2% of FLQL's money is in holdings SDVD also owns. 18.3% of SDVD's money is in holdings FLQL also owns.
SDVD and FLQL share little of their money.
30 positions in common, counted across the 217 positions we hold weights for in FLQL and 172 in SDVD, against full books of 219 and 348.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 139 positions for SDVD that do not appear in our book for FLQL (79.8% of the fund), and 183 for FLQL that do not appear in SDVD (95.0%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in FLQL | Weight in SDVD | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NTAPNetapp Inc | 0.29% | 0.97% | 0.68% |
| WSMWilliams-sonoma Inc | 0.16% | 1.00% | 0.84% |
| RGAReinsurance Group of America, Incorporated | 0.11% | 1.03% | 0.92% |
| EXPEExpedia Inc | 0.19% | 0.93% | 0.74% |
| THGHanover Insurance Group Inc | 0.09% | 0.99% | 0.90% |
| FIXComfort Systems USA Inc. | 0.41% | 0.63% | 0.22% |
| TROWT Rowe Price Grp | 0.13% | 0.89% | 0.76% |
| MLIMueller Industries Inc | 0.10% | 0.91% | 0.81% |
| SYFSynchrony Financial | 0.15% | 0.85% | 0.70% |
| SNASnap-On Inc. | 0.10% | 0.87% | 0.77% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of FLQL and SDVD you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FLQL or SDVD?
FLQL has an expense ratio of 0.15% while SDVD charges 0.85%. FLQL is the cheaper option, by $70 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, FLQL or SDVD?
Over the past year FLQL returned +16.39% vs +6.25% for SDVD, so FLQL leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, FLQL or SDVD?
SDVD has been the more volatile fund at 22.2% annualized versus 12.8% for FLQL. Worst drawdown: FLQL -19.3% vs SDVD -29.1%.
Should I hold both FLQL and SDVD?
FLQL and SDVD have a monthly-return correlation of 0.66, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between FLQL and SDVD?
18.3% of SDVD's money is in holdings FLQL also owns. 18.3% of SDVD's is in holdings FLQL also owns. They hold 30 positions in common, counted across the 217 positions we hold weights for in FLQL and 172 in SDVD.
Which pays a higher dividend, FLQL or SDVD?
FLQL yields 1.06% while SDVD yields 8.68%, so SDVD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is SDVD better than FLQL?
FLQL has a lower expense ratio. FLQL led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. SDVD is less concentrated, with 10.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.2%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.