FLQM vs TMID

FLQM vs TMID

Which is better, FLQM or TMID?

FLQM costs less.

FLQM has a lower expense ratio. TMID is less concentrated, with 9.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 11.5%.

Lower Fees: FLQMLess Concentrated: TMID

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricFLQMTMID
Expense Ratio0.30%Best0.47%
AUM$1.4B$12M
Dividend Yield1.71%0.00%
Holdings210391
YTD Return+4.87%Best+0.46%
1Y Return+5.37%-
3Y Return (annualized)+12.15%-
5Y Return (annualized)+6.76%-
Top 10 Weight11.5%9.6%Best
Fund FamilyFranklin Templeton Investments (US)T.Rowe Price
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleMid Cap BlendMid Cap Blend
InceptionApr 26, 2017Sep 16, 2026

Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.

FLQM vs TMID growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

Compare FLQM against instead:FLQM vs SPYFLQM vs QQQFLQM vs VOOFLQM vs VTITMID against:TMID vs VXUS

FLQM vs TMID Performance

Franklin US Mid Cap Multifactor Index ETF (FLQM) is an ETF from Franklin Templeton Investments (US) and T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Equity Research ETF (TMID) is an ETF from T.Rowe Price. Year to date, FLQM is up 4.87% versus a gain of 0.46% for TMID.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

FLQM charges 0.30% per year while TMID charges 0.47%. On a $10,000 position that is $30 vs $47 annually, a gap of $17 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FLQM currently yields 1.71% against 0.00% for TMID.

Holdings Overlap

FLQM already in TMID44.8%
TMID already in FLQM19.5%

44.8% of FLQM's money is in holdings TMID also owns. 19.5% of TMID's money is in holdings FLQM also owns.

The two portfolios partly overlap.

74 positions in common, counted across the 205 positions we hold weights for in FLQM and 391 in TMID, against full books of 210 and 391.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 293 positions for TMID that do not appear in our book for FLQM (74.6% of the fund), and 125 for FLQM that do not appear in TMID (52.7%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in FLQMWeight in TMIDDifference
ALNYAlnylam Pharmaceuticals Inc.0.72%1.31%0.59%
VLTOVeralto Corp0.86%0.93%0.07%
TERTeradyne Inc - Common1.13%0.54%0.59%
WATWaters Corp.1.10%0.53%0.57%
GRMNGarminltd.1.19%0.32%0.87%
YUMYum! Brands, Inc.0.91%0.60%0.31%
ULTAUlta Beauty Inc.1.05%0.44%0.61%
DALDl Co., Ltd.1.01%0.46%0.55%
THCTenet Healthcare Corp Common Stock Usd 0.050.87%0.56%0.31%
BDXBecton Dickinson And Co.0.93%0.49%0.44%

44.8% of FLQM is already inside TMID.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

FLQMTMID

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, FLQM or TMID?

FLQM has an expense ratio of 0.30% while TMID charges 0.47%. FLQM is the cheaper option, by $17 a year on a $10,000 investment.

What is the holdings overlap between FLQM and TMID?

44.8% of FLQM's money is in holdings TMID also owns. 19.5% of TMID's is in holdings FLQM also owns. They hold 74 positions in common, counted across the 205 positions we hold weights for in FLQM and 391 in TMID.

Which pays a higher dividend, FLQM or TMID?

FLQM yields 1.71% while TMID yields 0.00%, so FLQM currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is TMID better than FLQM?

FLQM has a lower expense ratio. TMID is less concentrated, with 9.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 11.5%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.