FLQS vs SCDV
Franklin US Small Cap Multifactor Index ETF vs Bahl & Gaynor Small Cap Dividend ETF
Which is better, FLQS or SCDV?
FLQS has been ahead.
FLQS has a lower expense ratio. FLQS led over 1Y and the full window. FLQS is less concentrated, with 9.7% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 48.0%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FLQS | SCDV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.35%Best | 0.70% |
| AUM | $50M | $148M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.57% | 0.43% |
| Holdings | 497 | 40 |
| YTD Return | +9.82%Best | +6.54% |
| 1Y Return | +9.87%Best | +3.53% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +12.65% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +5.25% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 13.9%Best | 14.5% |
| Max Drawdown | -20.9%Best | -22.8% |
| $10,000 over 1.8 years | $10,733Best | $10,403 |
| Top 10 Weight | 9.7%Best | 48.0% |
| Fund Family | Franklin Templeton Investments (US) | Bahl & Gaynor |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Small Cap Blend | Small Cap Blend |
| Inception | Apr 26, 2017 | Dec 11, 2024 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.8 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Dec 12, 2024 to Oct 14, 2026 (1.8 years).
FLQS vs SCDV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.8 years both funds cover.
FLQS vs SCDV Performance
Franklin US Small Cap Multifactor Index ETF (FLQS) is an ETF from Franklin Templeton Investments (US) and Bahl & Gaynor Small Cap Dividend ETF (SCDV) is an ETF from Bahl & Gaynor. Over the past year FLQS returned +9.87% while SCDV returned +3.53%. Year to date, FLQS is up 9.82% versus a gain of 6.54% for SCDV.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
SCDV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.5% compared with 13.9% for FLQS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -20.9% for FLQS and -22.8% for SCDV. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.86. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FLQS charges 0.35% per year while SCDV charges 0.70%. On a $10,000 position that is $35 vs $70 annually, a gap of $35 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FLQS currently yields 1.57% against 0.43% for SCDV.
Holdings Overlap
5.0% of FLQS's money is in holdings SCDV also owns. 14.5% of SCDV's money is in holdings FLQS also owns.
SCDV and FLQS share little of their money.
9 positions in common, counted across the 491 positions we hold weights for in FLQS and 36 in SCDV, against full books of 497 and 40.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 26 positions for SCDV that do not appear in our book for FLQS (81.6% of the fund), and 459 for FLQS that do not appear in SCDV (89.9%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in FLQS | Weight in SCDV | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| VCTRVictory Receivables Corp | 0.31% | 4.59% | 4.28% |
| MOG.AMoog Inccommon Stock | 1.04% | 1.80% | 0.76% |
| SXTSensient Technologies Corp | 0.75% | 1.62% | 0.87% |
| PSMTPricesmart Inc | 0.66% | 1.61% | 0.95% |
| SWXSouthwest Gas Holdings Inc Common Stock Usd 1 | 0.71% | 0.98% | 0.27% |
| IPARInter Parfums Inc | 0.33% | 1.33% | 1.00% |
| BMIBadger Meter, Inc. | 0.50% | 1.15% | 0.65% |
| IBPInstalled Building Products | 0.56% | 0.61% | 0.05% |
| WINAWinmark Corp | 0.10% | 0.83% | 0.73% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of FLQS and SCDV you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FLQS or SCDV?
FLQS has an expense ratio of 0.35% while SCDV charges 0.70%. FLQS is the cheaper option, by $35 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, FLQS or SCDV?
Over the past year FLQS returned +9.87% vs +3.53% for SCDV, so FLQS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), FLQS annualized +4.01% vs +2.22% for SCDV. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, FLQS or SCDV?
SCDV has been the more volatile fund at 14.5% annualized versus 13.9% for FLQS. Worst drawdown: FLQS -20.9% vs SCDV -22.8%.
Should I hold both FLQS and SCDV?
FLQS and SCDV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.86, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between FLQS and SCDV?
14.5% of SCDV's money is in holdings FLQS also owns. 14.5% of SCDV's is in holdings FLQS also owns. They hold 9 positions in common, counted across the 491 positions we hold weights for in FLQS and 36 in SCDV.
Which pays a higher dividend, FLQS or SCDV?
FLQS yields 1.57% while SCDV yields 0.43%, so FLQS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is SCDV better than FLQS?
FLQS has a lower expense ratio. FLQS led over 1Y and the full window. FLQS is less concentrated, with 9.7% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 48.0%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.