FLV vs PRVS
American Century Focused Large Cap Value ETF vs Parnassus Value Select ETF
Which is better, FLV or PRVS?
PRVS has been ahead.
FLV has a lower expense ratio. PRVS led over 1Y and the full window. FLV is less concentrated, with 32.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 49.7%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FLV | PRVS |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.42%Best | 0.59% |
| AUM | $379M | $28M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.73% | 0.52% |
| Holdings | 56 | 56 |
| YTD Return | +12.50% | +15.17%Best |
| 1Y Return | +16.84% | +21.88%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +16.33% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +9.83% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 11.2%Best | 13.0% |
| Max Drawdown | -11.6%Best | -17.6% |
| $10,000 over 1.8 years | $12,636 | $13,028Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 32.6%Best | 49.7% |
| Fund Family | American Century ETFs | Parnassus Investments |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Mar 31, 2020 | Dec 12, 2024 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.8 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Dec 12, 2024 to Oct 14, 2026 (1.8 years).
FLV vs PRVS growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.8 years both funds cover.
FLV vs PRVS Performance
American Century Focused Large Cap Value ETF (FLV) is an ETF from American Century ETFs and Parnassus Value Select ETF (PRVS) is an ETF from Parnassus Investments. Over the past year FLV returned +16.84% while PRVS returned +21.88%. Year to date, FLV is up 12.50% versus a gain of 15.17% for PRVS.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
PRVS has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 13.0% compared with 11.2% for FLV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -11.6% for FLV and -17.6% for PRVS. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.65. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FLV charges 0.42% per year while PRVS charges 0.59%. On a $10,000 position that is $42 vs $59 annually, a gap of $17 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FLV currently yields 1.73% against 0.52% for PRVS.
Holdings Overlap
15.8% of FLV's money is in holdings PRVS also owns. 35.3% of PRVS's money is in holdings FLV also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
The two holdings books were reported 100 days apart, FLV as of Jun 30, 2026 and PRVS as of Oct 8, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
7 positions in common, counted across the 52 positions we hold weights for in FLV and 27 in PRVS, against full books of 56 and 56.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 17 positions for PRVS that do not appear in our book for FLV (52.7% of the fund), and 40 for FLV that do not appear in PRVS (77.3%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
35.3% of PRVS is already inside FLV.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FLV or PRVS?
FLV has an expense ratio of 0.42% while PRVS charges 0.59%. FLV is the cheaper option, by $17 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, FLV or PRVS?
Over the past year FLV returned +16.84% vs +21.88% for PRVS, so PRVS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), FLV annualized +13.88% vs +15.83% for PRVS. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, FLV or PRVS?
PRVS has been the more volatile fund at 13.0% annualized versus 11.2% for FLV. Worst drawdown: FLV -11.6% vs PRVS -17.6%.
Should I hold both FLV and PRVS?
FLV and PRVS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.65, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between FLV and PRVS?
35.3% of PRVS's money is in holdings FLV also owns. 35.3% of PRVS's is in holdings FLV also owns. They hold 7 positions in common, counted across the 52 positions we hold weights for in FLV and 27 in PRVS.
Which pays a higher dividend, FLV or PRVS?
FLV yields 1.73% while PRVS yields 0.52%, so FLV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is PRVS better than FLV?
FLV has a lower expense ratio. PRVS led over 1Y and the full window. FLV is less concentrated, with 32.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 49.7%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.