FLV vs QUVU
American Century Focused Large Cap Value ETF vs Hartford Quality Value ETF
Which is better, FLV or QUVU?
Each has led over a different period.
FLV has a lower expense ratio. FLV led over the full window, QUVU over 1Y. QUVU is less concentrated, with 25.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 32.6%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FLV | QUVU |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.42%Best | 0.45% |
| AUM | $379M | $174M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.73% | 1.87% |
| Holdings | 56 | 72 |
| Volatility (annualized) | 11.7% | 11.6%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -12.4%Best | -13.1% |
| $10,000 over 2.5 years | $14,508Best | $13,110 |
| Top 10 Weight | 32.6% | 25.8%Best |
| Fund Family | American Century ETFs | Hartford Funds |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Mar 31, 2020 | Oct 13, 2023 |
Not shown on this pair: YTD Return, 1Y Return, 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized).
The two price series end 168 days apart, so a return over any period would be measuring two different stretches of market. Those rows are withheld. FLV has data through Oct 14, 2026 and QUVU through Apr 29, 2026.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.5 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Oct 16, 2023 to Apr 29, 2026 (2.5 years).
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
FLV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 11.7% compared with 11.6% for QUVU. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -12.4% for FLV and -13.1% for QUVU. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.88. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FLV charges 0.42% per year while QUVU charges 0.45%. On a $10,000 position that is $42 vs $45 annually, a gap of $3 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FLV currently yields 1.73% against 1.87% for QUVU.
Holdings Overlap
29.9% of FLV's money is in holdings QUVU also owns. 26.5% of QUVU's money is in holdings FLV also owns.
FLV and QUVU share little of their money.
The two holdings books were reported 181 days apart, FLV as of Jun 30, 2026 and QUVU as of Dec 31, 2025, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
13 positions in common, counted across the 52 positions we hold weights for in FLV and 70 in QUVU, against full books of 56 and 72.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 53 positions for QUVU that do not appear in our book for FLV (68.5% of the fund), and 36 for FLV that do not appear in QUVU (65.6%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in FLV | Weight in QUVU | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc | 1.33% | 5.56% | 4.23% |
| MMCMarsh & Mclennan Cos Inc Common Stock Usd 1 | 4.04% | 1.42% | 2.62% |
| DUKDuke Energy Corp | 3.54% | 1.38% | 2.16% |
| TFCTruist Financial Corp. | 2.49% | 2.22% | 0.27% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 3.46% | 1.16% | 2.30% |
| JPMJpmorgan Chase | 3.25% | 1.16% | 2.09% |
| UNHUnitedhealth Group Incorporated | 2.22% | 2.18% | 0.04% |
| UL:LNUnilever PLC | 2.32% | 2.06% | 0.26% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 3.07% | 1.25% | 1.82% |
| CSCOCisco Systems Inc. - Ordinary Shares | 1.82% | 1.97% | 0.15% |
29.9% of FLV is already inside QUVU.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FLV or QUVU?
FLV has an expense ratio of 0.42% while QUVU charges 0.45%. FLV is the cheaper option, by $3 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which is riskier, FLV or QUVU?
FLV has been the more volatile fund at 11.7% annualized versus 11.6% for QUVU. Worst drawdown: FLV -12.4% vs QUVU -13.1%.
Should I hold both FLV and QUVU?
FLV and QUVU have a monthly-return correlation of 0.88, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between FLV and QUVU?
29.9% of FLV's money is in holdings QUVU also owns. 26.5% of QUVU's is in holdings FLV also owns. They hold 13 positions in common, counted across the 52 positions we hold weights for in FLV and 70 in QUVU.
Which pays a higher dividend, FLV or QUVU?
FLV yields 1.73% while QUVU yields 1.87%, so QUVU currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is QUVU better than FLV?
FLV has a lower expense ratio. FLV led over the full window, QUVU over 1Y. QUVU is less concentrated, with 25.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 32.6%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.