FLV vs SASS
American Century Focused Large Cap Value ETF vs M.D. Sass Concentrated Value ETF
Which is better, FLV or SASS?
FLV costs less.
FLV has a lower expense ratio. FLV is less concentrated, with 32.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 57.2%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FLV | SASS |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.42%Best | 0.75% |
| AUM | $379M | $76M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.73% | 0.00% |
| Holdings | 56 | 24 |
| YTD Return | +12.50%Best | -7.30% |
| 1Y Return | +16.84% | - |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +16.33% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +9.83% | - |
| Top 10 Weight | 32.6%Best | 57.2% |
| Fund Family | American Century ETFs | MD Sass |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Mar 31, 2020 | Mar 4, 2026 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
FLV vs SASS growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
FLV vs SASS Performance
American Century Focused Large Cap Value ETF (FLV) is an ETF from American Century ETFs and M.D. Sass Concentrated Value ETF (SASS) is an ETF from MD Sass. Year to date, FLV is up 12.50% versus a loss of 7.30% for SASS.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FLV charges 0.42% per year while SASS charges 0.75%. On a $10,000 position that is $42 vs $75 annually, a gap of $33 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FLV currently yields 1.73% against 0.00% for SASS.
Holdings Overlap
7.1% of FLV's money is in holdings SASS also owns. 17.9% of SASS's money is in holdings FLV also owns.
SASS and FLV share little of their money.
The two holdings books were reported 93 days apart, FLV as of Jun 30, 2026 and SASS as of Oct 1, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
3 positions in common, counted across the 52 positions we hold weights for in FLV and 22 in SASS, against full books of 56 and 24.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 19 positions for SASS that do not appear in our book for FLV (77.9% of the fund), and 44 for FLV that do not appear in SASS (86.1%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of FLV and SASS you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FLV or SASS?
FLV has an expense ratio of 0.42% while SASS charges 0.75%. FLV is the cheaper option, by $33 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between FLV and SASS?
17.9% of SASS's money is in holdings FLV also owns. 17.9% of SASS's is in holdings FLV also owns. They hold 3 positions in common, counted across the 52 positions we hold weights for in FLV and 22 in SASS.
Which pays a higher dividend, FLV or SASS?
FLV yields 1.73% while SASS yields 0.00%, so FLV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is SASS better than FLV?
FLV has a lower expense ratio. FLV is less concentrated, with 32.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 57.2%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.