FLXR vs RMIF
TCW Flexible Income ETF vs LHA Risk-Managed Income ETF
Which is better, FLXR or RMIF?
Each has led over a different period.
FLXR has a lower expense ratio. FLXR led over the full window, RMIF over 1Y.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FLXR | RMIF |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.40%Best | 1.55% |
| AUM | - | $6M |
| Dividend Yield | 6.26% | 5.68% |
| Holdings | 1,602 | 7 |
| Volatility (annualized) | 3.0% | 2.5%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -1.9%Best | -3.7% |
| $10,000 over 2.1 years | $11,504Best | $10,496 |
| Fund Family | TCW ETFs | Little Harbor Advisors |
| Category | Fixed Income | Fixed Income |
| Style | Intermediate Term Bond | Intermediate Term Bond |
| Inception | Jun 24, 2024 | Jun 9, 2023 |
Not shown on this pair: YTD Return, 1Y Return, 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized), Top 10 Weight.
The two price series end 79 days apart, so a return over any period would be measuring two different stretches of market. Those rows are withheld. FLXR has data through Oct 14, 2026 and RMIF through Jul 27, 2026.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.1 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jun 24, 2024 to Jul 27, 2026 (2.1 years).
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
FLXR has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 3.0% compared with 2.5% for RMIF. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -1.9% for FLXR and -3.7% for RMIF. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.58. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FLXR charges 0.40% per year while RMIF charges 1.55%. On a $10,000 position that is $40 vs $155 annually, a gap of $115 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FLXR currently yields 6.26% against 5.68% for RMIF.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 54 holdings in FLXR and 6 in RMIF, totalling 13.7% and 100.0% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
The two holdings books were reported 141 days apart, FLXR as of Sep 18, 2026 and RMIF as of Apr 30, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
0 positions in common, counted across the 54 positions we hold weights for in FLXR and 6 in RMIF, against full books of 1,602 and 7.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of FLXR and RMIF you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FLXR or RMIF?
FLXR has an expense ratio of 0.40% while RMIF charges 1.55%. FLXR is the cheaper option, by $115 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which is riskier, FLXR or RMIF?
FLXR has been the more volatile fund at 3.0% annualized versus 2.5% for RMIF. Worst drawdown: FLXR -1.9% vs RMIF -3.7%.
Should I hold both FLXR and RMIF?
FLXR and RMIF have a monthly-return correlation of 0.58, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, FLXR or RMIF?
FLXR yields 6.26% while RMIF yields 5.68%, so FLXR currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is RMIF better than FLXR?
FLXR has a lower expense ratio. FLXR led over the full window, RMIF over 1Y. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.