FMAG vs MTAW

FMAG vs MTAW

Which is better, FMAG or MTAW?

FMAG costs less.

FMAG has a lower expense ratio. FMAG is less concentrated, with 44.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 54.5%.

Lower Fees: FMAGLess Concentrated: FMAG

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricFMAGMTAW
Expense Ratio0.57%Best0.59%
AUM$243M$2M
Dividend Yield0.00%0.00%
Holdings5225
YTD Return+4.66%Best-1.65%
1Y Return+3.01%-
3Y Return (annualized)+17.63%-
5Y Return (annualized)+9.04%-
Top 10 Weight44.0%Best54.5%
Fund FamilyFidelity Investments (US)Harbor Funds
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap GrowthLarge Cap Growth
InceptionFeb 2, 2021Aug 12, 2026

Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.

FMAG vs MTAW growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

Compare FMAG against instead:FMAG vs SPYFMAG vs QQQFMAG vs VOOFMAG vs VTIMTAW against:MTAW vs VXUS

FMAG vs MTAW Performance

Fidelity Magellan ETF (FMAG) is an ETF from Fidelity Investments (US) and Meta AI Lab Ecosystem ETF (MTAW) is an ETF from Harbor Funds. Year to date, FMAG is up 4.66% versus a loss of 1.65% for MTAW.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

FMAG charges 0.57% per year while MTAW charges 0.59%. On a $10,000 position that is $57 vs $59 annually, a gap of $2 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FMAG currently yields 0.00% against 0.00% for MTAW.

Holdings Overlap

FMAG already in MTAW25.8%
MTAW already in FMAG23.6%

25.8% of FMAG's money is in holdings MTAW also owns. 23.6% of MTAW's money is in holdings FMAG also owns.

FMAG and MTAW share little of their money.

7 positions in common, counted across the 50 positions we hold weights for in FMAG and 25 in MTAW, against full books of 52 and 25.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 14 positions for MTAW that do not appear in our book for FMAG (60.0% of the fund), and 43 for FMAG that do not appear in MTAW (73.6%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in FMAGWeight in MTAWDifference
NVDANvidia Corp10.24%3.50%6.74%
AVGOBroadcom Inc4.55%2.92%1.63%
GOOGAlphabet Inc. C3.28%3.17%0.11%
CIENCiena Corp1.18%4.86%3.68%
2330:TWTaiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Ltd2.01%3.90%1.89%
AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc3.14%2.73%0.41%
ANETArista Networks Inc Common Stock1.39%2.53%1.14%

25.8% of FMAG is already inside MTAW.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

FMAGMTAW

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, FMAG or MTAW?

FMAG has an expense ratio of 0.57% while MTAW charges 0.59%. FMAG is the cheaper option, by $2 a year on a $10,000 investment.

What is the holdings overlap between FMAG and MTAW?

25.8% of FMAG's money is in holdings MTAW also owns. 23.6% of MTAW's is in holdings FMAG also owns. They hold 7 positions in common, counted across the 50 positions we hold weights for in FMAG and 25 in MTAW.

Which pays a higher dividend, FMAG or MTAW?

FMAG yields 0.00% while MTAW yields 0.00%, so FMAG currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is MTAW better than FMAG?

FMAG has a lower expense ratio. FMAG is less concentrated, with 44.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 54.5%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.