FMAY vs SEPM

FMAY vs SEPM

Which is better, FMAY or SEPM?

FMAY has been ahead.

FMAY led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.95.

Lower Fees: TiedHigher Returns: FMAY

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricFMAYSEPM
Expense Ratio0.85%Tie0.85%Tie
AUM$1.5B$37M
Dividend Yield0.00%0.00%
Holdings1010
YTD Return+8.03%Best+5.12%
1Y Return+10.90%Best+6.53%
3Y Return (annualized)+14.11%-
5Y Return (annualized)+9.29%-
Volatility (annualized)7.3%2.6%Best
Max Drawdown-13.1%-3.9%Best
$10,000 over 2.1 years$12,523Best$11,333
Fund FamilyFirst Trust Portfolios (US)First Trust Portfolios (US)
CategoryAlternativeAlternative
StyleOption WritingOption Writing
InceptionMay 15, 2020Sep 20, 2024

Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.

Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.1 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Sep 23, 2024 to Oct 14, 2026 (2.1 years).

FMAY vs SEPM growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2.1 years both funds cover.

Compare FMAY against instead:FMAY vs SPYFMAY vs QQQFMAY vs VOOFMAY vs VTISEPM against:SEPM vs VXUS

FMAY vs SEPM Performance

FT Vest US Equity Buffer ETF - May (FMAY) is an ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US) and FT Vest US Equity Max Buffer ETF - September (SEPM) is an ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US). Over the past year FMAY returned +10.90% while SEPM returned +6.53%. Year to date, FMAY is up 8.03% versus a gain of 5.12% for SEPM.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

FMAY has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 7.3% compared with 2.6% for SEPM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -13.1% for FMAY and -3.9% for SEPM. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.95. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.

Fees and Cost Over Time

FMAY charges 0.85% per year while SEPM charges 0.85%. On a $10,000 position that is $85 vs $85 annually. On income, FMAY currently yields 0.00% against 0.00% for SEPM.

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of FMAY and SEPM you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

FMAYSEPM

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, FMAY or SEPM?

FMAY has an expense ratio of 0.85% while SEPM charges 0.85%. At the precision these are quoted to, they cost the same.

Which performed better, FMAY or SEPM?

Over the past year FMAY returned +10.90% vs +6.53% for SEPM, so FMAY leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), FMAY annualized +11.31% vs +6.14% for SEPM. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, FMAY or SEPM?

FMAY has been the more volatile fund at 7.3% annualized versus 2.6% for SEPM. Worst drawdown: FMAY -13.1% vs SEPM -3.9%.

Should I hold both FMAY and SEPM?

FMAY and SEPM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.95, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which pays a higher dividend, FMAY or SEPM?

FMAY yields 0.00% while SEPM yields 0.00%, so SEPM currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is SEPM better than FMAY?

FMAY led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.95. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.