FMHI vs TAFL
First Trust Municipal High Income ETF vs AB Tax-Aware Long Municipal ETF
Which is better, FMHI or TAFL?
Nearly the same fund. TAFL costs less.
TAFL has a lower expense ratio. FMHI led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.96.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FMHI | TAFL |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.49% | 0.28%Best |
| AUM | $1.0B | $60M |
| Dividend Yield | 4.67% | 4.37% |
| Holdings | 1,524 | 326 |
| YTD Return | -2.09%Best | -2.82% |
| 1Y Return | -1.35%Best | -2.42% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +4.52% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -0.19% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 5.1%Best | 5.5% |
| Max Drawdown | -7.4%Best | -7.8% |
| $10,000 over 2.8 years | $10,769Best | $10,454 |
| Fund Family | First Trust Portfolios (US) | AllianceBernstein L.P. |
| Category | Tax Preferred | Tax Preferred |
| Style | Municipal Bond | Municipal Bond |
| Inception | Nov 2, 2017 | Dec 13, 2023 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.8 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Dec 13, 2023 to Oct 15, 2026 (2.8 years).
FMHI vs TAFL growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2.8 years both funds cover.
FMHI vs TAFL Performance
First Trust Municipal High Income ETF (FMHI) is an ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US) and AB Tax-Aware Long Municipal ETF (TAFL) is an ETF from AllianceBernstein L.P.. Over the past year FMHI returned -1.35% while TAFL returned -2.42%. Year to date, FMHI is down 2.09% versus a loss of 2.82% for TAFL.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
TAFL has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 5.5% compared with 5.1% for FMHI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -7.4% for FMHI and -7.8% for TAFL. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.96. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FMHI charges 0.49% per year while TAFL charges 0.28%. On a $10,000 position that is $49 vs $28 annually, a gap of $21 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FMHI currently yields 4.67% against 4.37% for TAFL.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 2 holdings in FMHI and 68 in TAFL, totalling 0.2% and 50.6% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 2 positions we hold weights for in FMHI and 68 in TAFL, against full books of 1,524 and 326.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of FMHI and TAFL you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FMHI or TAFL?
FMHI has an expense ratio of 0.49% while TAFL charges 0.28%. TAFL is the cheaper option, by $21 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, FMHI or TAFL?
Over the past year FMHI returned -1.35% vs -2.42% for TAFL, so FMHI leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, FMHI or TAFL?
TAFL has been the more volatile fund at 5.5% annualized versus 5.1% for FMHI. Worst drawdown: FMHI -7.4% vs TAFL -7.8%.
Should I hold both FMHI and TAFL?
FMHI and TAFL have a monthly-return correlation of 0.96, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, FMHI or TAFL?
FMHI yields 4.67% while TAFL yields 4.37%, so FMHI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is TAFL better than FMHI?
TAFL has a lower expense ratio. FMHI led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.96. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.