FNGD vs VTI
MicroSectors FANG+ Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, FNGD or VTI?
Opposite sides of the same exposure.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. The two move opposite each other, correlation -0.71, so holding both offsets the exposure while paying both fees. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 100.0%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FNGD | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.95% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $46M | $689.2B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 1.06% |
| Holdings | 10 | 3,524 |
| YTD Return | -55.23% | +13.02%Best |
| 1Y Return | -52.27% | +16.63%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | -69.51% | +21.97%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -64.73% | +11.99%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 71.2% | 16.8%Best |
| Max Drawdown | - | -35.0% |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $55 | $17,616Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 100.0% | 33.5%Best |
| Fund Family | BMO Capital Markets | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Alternative | Equity |
| Style | Trading-Inverse Equity | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jan 22, 2018 | May 24, 2001 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Jan 23, 2018 to Oct 14, 2026 (8.7 years).
FNGD vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 8.7 years both funds cover.
FNGD vs VTI Performance
MicroSectors FANG+ Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN (FNGD) is an ETF from BMO Capital Markets and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year FNGD returned -52.27% while VTI returned +16.63%. Year to date, FNGD is down 55.23% versus a gain of 13.02% for VTI.
Over three years, FNGD compounded at -69.51% per year against +21.97% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are -64.73% and +11.99% respectively. Across the full 9-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +12.55% annualized vs -70.13%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
FNGD has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 71.2% compared with 16.8% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.71. They move opposite each other. Holding both offsets the exposure rather than spreading it, while paying both funds' fees.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FNGD charges 0.95% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $95 vs $3 annually, a gap of $92 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FNGD currently yields 0.00% against 1.06% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
100.0% of FNGD's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 30.9% of VTI's money is in holdings FNGD also owns.
They hold the same names on opposite sides, so owning both offsets the exposure rather than doubling it.
10 positions in common, counted across the 10 positions we hold weights for in FNGD and 3,441 in VTI, against full books of 10 and 3,524.
What only one of them owns
Measured across the 10 and 3,441 positions we hold weights for.
VTI holds 1,146 positions FNGD does not, 66.6% of the fund.
Largest: GOOG 2.12%, TSLA 1.40%, LLY 1.33%, JPM 1.29%, BRK.B 1.23%
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in FNGD | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 10.29% | 6.88% | 3.41% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 9.65% | 6.30% | 3.35% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 10.08% | 5.11% | 4.97% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 9.76% | 3.41% | 6.35% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 11.08% | 1.46% | 9.62% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc | 9.67% | 2.70% | 6.97% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 9.97% | 2.38% | 7.59% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 10.38% | 1.70% | 8.68% |
| PLTRPalantir Technologies Inc | 10.34% | 0.55% | 9.79% |
| NFLXNetflix, Inc. | 8.78% | 0.46% | 8.32% |
100.0% of FNGD is already inside VTI.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FNGD or VTI?
FNGD has an expense ratio of 0.95% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $92 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, FNGD or VTI?
Over the past year FNGD returned -52.27% vs +16.63% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (9 years), FNGD annualized -70.13% vs +12.55% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, FNGD or VTI?
FNGD has been the more volatile fund at 71.2% annualized versus 16.8% for VTI.
Should I hold both FNGD and VTI?
FNGD and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of -0.71, so they move opposite each other. Holding both offsets the exposure rather than spreading it, and pays both funds' fees on the way. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between FNGD and VTI?
100.0% of FNGD's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 30.9% of VTI's is in holdings FNGD also owns. They hold 10 positions in common, counted across the 10 positions we hold weights for in FNGD and 3,441 in VTI.
Which pays a higher dividend, FNGD or VTI?
FNGD yields 0.00% while VTI yields 1.06%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than FNGD?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. The two move opposite each other, correlation -0.71, so holding both offsets the exposure while paying both fees. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 100.0%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.