FNGG vs VTI
Direxion Daily NYSE FANG+ Bull 2X ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, FNGG or VTI?
Trading-Leveraged Equity against Large Cap Blend.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. FNGG led over 1Y and 3Y, VTI over 5Y and the full window. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 89.7%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FNGG | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.96% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $124M | $689.2B |
| Dividend Yield | 8.98% | 1.06% |
| Holdings | 36 | 3,524 |
| YTD Return | +38.70%Best | +13.02% |
| 1Y Return | +27.96%Best | +16.63% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +61.84%Best | +21.97% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +3.39% | +11.99%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 57.6% | 15.8%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -91.3% | -25.4%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $11,814 | $17,616Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 89.7% | 33.5%Best |
| Fund Family | Direxion Shares ETF Trust | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Alternative | Equity |
| Style | Trading-Leveraged Equity | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Sep 29, 2021 | May 24, 2001 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Sep 30, 2021 to Oct 14, 2026 (5 years).
FNGG vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 5 years both funds cover.
FNGG vs VTI Performance
Direxion Daily NYSE FANG+ Bull 2X ETF (FNGG) is an ETF from Direxion Shares ETF Trust and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year FNGG returned +27.96% while VTI returned +16.63%. Year to date, FNGG is up 38.70% versus a gain of 13.02% for VTI.
Over three years, FNGG compounded at +61.84% per year against +21.97% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +3.39% and +11.99% respectively.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
FNGG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 57.6% compared with 15.8% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -91.3% for FNGG and -25.4% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.76. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FNGG charges 0.96% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $96 vs $3 annually, a gap of $93 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FNGG currently yields 8.98% against 1.06% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
45.4% of FNGG's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 30.9% of VTI's money is in holdings FNGG also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
10 positions in common, counted across the 12 positions we hold weights for in FNGG and 3,441 in VTI, against full books of 36 and 3,524.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 1,146 positions for VTI that do not appear in our book for FNGG (66.6% of the fund), and 2 for FNGG that do not appear in VTI (52.5%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in FNGG | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 4.76% | 6.88% | 2.12% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 4.37% | 6.30% | 1.93% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 4.60% | 5.11% | 0.51% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 4.45% | 3.41% | 1.04% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc | 4.36% | 2.70% | 1.66% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 4.56% | 2.38% | 2.18% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 5.05% | 1.46% | 3.59% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 4.71% | 1.70% | 3.01% |
| PLTRPalantir Technologies Inc | 4.72% | 0.55% | 4.17% |
| NFLXNetflix, Inc. | 3.82% | 0.46% | 3.36% |
45.4% of FNGG is already inside VTI.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FNGG or VTI?
FNGG has an expense ratio of 0.96% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $93 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, FNGG or VTI?
Over the past year FNGG returned +27.96% vs +16.63% for VTI, so FNGG leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, FNGG or VTI?
FNGG has been the more volatile fund at 57.6% annualized versus 15.8% for VTI. Worst drawdown: FNGG -91.3% vs VTI -25.4%.
Should I hold both FNGG and VTI?
FNGG and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.76, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between FNGG and VTI?
45.4% of FNGG's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 30.9% of VTI's is in holdings FNGG also owns. They hold 10 positions in common, counted across the 12 positions we hold weights for in FNGG and 3,441 in VTI.
Which pays a higher dividend, FNGG or VTI?
FNGG yields 8.98% while VTI yields 1.06%, so FNGG currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than FNGG?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. FNGG led over 1Y and 3Y, VTI over 5Y and the full window. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 89.7%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.