FNGO vs VTI
MicroSectors FANG+ Index 2X Leveraged ETN vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, FNGO or VTI?
Trading-Leveraged Equity against Large Cap Blend.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. FNGO led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 100.0%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FNGO | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.95% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $823M | $689.2B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 1.06% |
| Holdings | 20 | 3,524 |
| YTD Return | +39.45%Best | +13.02% |
| 1Y Return | +28.38%Best | +16.63% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +62.71%Best | +21.97% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +27.53%Best | +11.99% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 55.7% | 17.2%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -78.4% | -35.0%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $33,734Best | $17,616 |
| Top 10 Weight | 100.0% | 33.5%Best |
| Fund Family | BMO Capital Markets | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Alternative | Equity |
| Style | Trading-Leveraged Equity | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Aug 1, 2018 | May 24, 2001 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Aug 2, 2018 to Oct 14, 2026 (8.2 years).
FNGO vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 8.2 years both funds cover.
FNGO vs VTI Performance
MicroSectors FANG+ Index 2X Leveraged ETN (FNGO) is an ETF from BMO Capital Markets and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year FNGO returned +28.38% while VTI returned +16.63%. Year to date, FNGO is up 39.45% versus a gain of 13.02% for VTI.
Over three years, FNGO compounded at +62.71% per year against +21.97% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +27.53% and +11.99% respectively. Across the full 8-year window we track, FNGO has the edge at +39.51% annualized vs +13.37%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
FNGO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 55.7% compared with 17.2% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -78.4% for FNGO and -35.0% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.78. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FNGO charges 0.95% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $95 vs $3 annually, a gap of $92 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FNGO currently yields 0.00% against 1.06% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
100.0% of FNGO's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 30.9% of VTI's money is in holdings FNGO also owns.
Most of FNGO is already inside VTI. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
10 positions in common, counted across the 10 positions we hold weights for in FNGO and 3,441 in VTI, against full books of 20 and 3,524.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 1,146 positions for VTI that do not appear in our book for FNGO (66.6% of the fund), and 0 for FNGO that do not appear in VTI (0.0%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in FNGO | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 10.29% | 6.88% | 3.41% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 9.65% | 6.30% | 3.35% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 10.08% | 5.11% | 4.97% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 9.76% | 3.41% | 6.35% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 11.08% | 1.46% | 9.62% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc | 9.67% | 2.70% | 6.97% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 9.97% | 2.38% | 7.59% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 10.38% | 1.70% | 8.68% |
| PLTRPalantir Technologies Inc | 10.34% | 0.55% | 9.79% |
| NFLXNetflix, Inc. | 8.78% | 0.46% | 8.32% |
100.0% of FNGO is already inside VTI.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FNGO or VTI?
FNGO has an expense ratio of 0.95% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $92 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, FNGO or VTI?
Over the past year FNGO returned +28.38% vs +16.63% for VTI, so FNGO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (8 years), FNGO annualized +39.51% vs +13.37% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, FNGO or VTI?
FNGO has been the more volatile fund at 55.7% annualized versus 17.2% for VTI. Worst drawdown: FNGO -78.4% vs VTI -35.0%.
Should I hold both FNGO and VTI?
FNGO and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.78, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between FNGO and VTI?
100.0% of FNGO's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 30.9% of VTI's is in holdings FNGO also owns. They hold 10 positions in common, counted across the 10 positions we hold weights for in FNGO and 3,441 in VTI.
Which pays a higher dividend, FNGO or VTI?
FNGO yields 0.00% while VTI yields 1.06%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than FNGO?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. FNGO led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 100.0%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.