FNOV vs HEDG
FT Vest US Equity Buffer ETF - November vs Equable Shares Hedged Equity ETF
Which is better, FNOV or HEDG?
FNOV has been ahead.
FNOV has a lower expense ratio. FNOV led over 1Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FNOV | HEDG |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.85%Best | 0.96% |
| AUM | $1.3B | $465M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 2.78% |
| Holdings | 10 | 10 |
| YTD Return | +10.27%Best | +6.78% |
| 1Y Return | +14.72%Best | +10.34% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +15.26% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +9.54% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 7.8% | 3.6%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -5.7% | -3.9%Best |
| $10,000 over 1 years | $11,456Best | $11,015 |
| Fund Family | First Trust Portfolios (US) | Equable Shares |
| Category | Alternative | Alternative |
| Style | Option Writing | Option Writing |
| Inception | Nov 18, 2019 | Oct 13, 2025 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Oct 13, 2025 to Oct 14, 2026 (1 years).
FNOV vs HEDG growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1 years both funds cover.
FNOV vs HEDG Performance
FT Vest US Equity Buffer ETF - November (FNOV) is an ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US) and Equable Shares Hedged Equity ETF (HEDG) is an ETF from Equable Shares. Over the past year FNOV returned +14.72% while HEDG returned +10.34%. Year to date, FNOV is up 10.27% versus a gain of 6.78% for HEDG.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
FNOV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 7.8% compared with 3.6% for HEDG. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -5.7% for FNOV and -3.9% for HEDG. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.88. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FNOV charges 0.85% per year while HEDG charges 0.96%. On a $10,000 position that is $85 vs $96 annually, a gap of $11 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FNOV currently yields 0.00% against 2.78% for HEDG.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of FNOV and HEDG you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FNOV or HEDG?
FNOV has an expense ratio of 0.85% while HEDG charges 0.96%. FNOV is the cheaper option, by $11 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, FNOV or HEDG?
Over the past year FNOV returned +14.72% vs +10.34% for HEDG, so FNOV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), FNOV annualized +14.56% vs +10.15% for HEDG. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, FNOV or HEDG?
FNOV has been the more volatile fund at 7.8% annualized versus 3.6% for HEDG. Worst drawdown: FNOV -5.7% vs HEDG -3.9%.
Should I hold both FNOV and HEDG?
FNOV and HEDG have a monthly-return correlation of 0.88, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, FNOV or HEDG?
FNOV yields 0.00% while HEDG yields 2.78%, so HEDG currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is HEDG better than FNOV?
FNOV has a lower expense ratio. FNOV led over 1Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.