FOCT vs UXJL
FT Vest US Equity Buffer ETF - October vs FT Vest US Equity Uncapped Accelerator ETF - July
Which is better, FOCT or UXJL?
UXJL has been ahead.
UXJL led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.98.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FOCT | UXJL |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.85%Tie | 0.85%Tie |
| AUM | $1.2B | $6M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Holdings | 10 | 8 |
| YTD Return | +11.60% | +13.31%Best |
| 1Y Return | +14.86% | +16.73%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +13.66% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +9.65% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 7.4%Best | 13.8% |
| Max Drawdown | -5.7%Best | -10.3% |
| $10,000 over 1.2 years | $12,015 | $12,315Best |
| Fund Family | First Trust Portfolios (US) | First Trust Portfolios (US) |
| Category | Alternative | Alternative |
| Style | Option Writing | Option Writing |
| Inception | Oct 16, 2020 | Jul 18, 2025 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.2 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jul 21, 2025 to Oct 14, 2026 (1.2 years).
FOCT vs UXJL growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.2 years both funds cover.
FOCT vs UXJL Performance
FT Vest US Equity Buffer ETF - October (FOCT) is an ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US) and FT Vest US Equity Uncapped Accelerator ETF - July (UXJL) is an ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US). Over the past year FOCT returned +14.86% while UXJL returned +16.73%. Year to date, FOCT is up 11.60% versus a gain of 13.31% for UXJL.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
UXJL has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 13.8% compared with 7.4% for FOCT. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -5.7% for FOCT and -10.3% for UXJL. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.98. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FOCT charges 0.85% per year while UXJL charges 0.85%. On a $10,000 position that is $85 vs $85 annually. On income, FOCT currently yields 0.00% against 0.00% for UXJL.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of FOCT and UXJL you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FOCT or UXJL?
FOCT has an expense ratio of 0.85% while UXJL charges 0.85%. At the precision these are quoted to, they cost the same.
Which performed better, FOCT or UXJL?
Over the past year FOCT returned +14.86% vs +16.73% for UXJL, so UXJL leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), FOCT annualized +16.53% vs +18.95% for UXJL. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, FOCT or UXJL?
UXJL has been the more volatile fund at 13.8% annualized versus 7.4% for FOCT. Worst drawdown: FOCT -5.7% vs UXJL -10.3%.
Should I hold both FOCT and UXJL?
FOCT and UXJL have a monthly-return correlation of 0.98, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, FOCT or UXJL?
FOCT yields 0.00% while UXJL yields 0.00%, so UXJL currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is UXJL better than FOCT?
UXJL led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.98. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.