FOCT vs XAPR
FT Vest US Equity Buffer ETF - October vs FT Vest US Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - April
Which is better, FOCT or XAPR?
FOCT has been ahead.
FOCT led over 1Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FOCT | XAPR |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.85%Tie | 0.85%Tie |
| AUM | $1.2B | $52M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Holdings | 10 | 12 |
| YTD Return | +11.60%Best | +6.28% |
| 1Y Return | +14.86%Best | +8.17% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +13.66% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +9.65% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 7.5% | 2.4%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -13.1% | -6.2%Best |
| $10,000 over 2.5 years | $13,658Best | $12,987 |
| Fund Family | First Trust Portfolios (US) | First Trust Portfolios (US) |
| Category | Alternative | Alternative |
| Style | Option Writing | Option Writing |
| Inception | Oct 16, 2020 | Apr 19, 2024 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.5 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Apr 22, 2024 to Oct 14, 2026 (2.5 years).
FOCT vs XAPR growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2.5 years both funds cover.
FOCT vs XAPR Performance
FT Vest US Equity Buffer ETF - October (FOCT) is an ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US) and FT Vest US Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - April (XAPR) is an ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US). Over the past year FOCT returned +14.86% while XAPR returned +8.17%. Year to date, FOCT is up 11.60% versus a gain of 6.28% for XAPR.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
FOCT has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 7.5% compared with 2.4% for XAPR. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -13.1% for FOCT and -6.2% for XAPR. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.42. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FOCT charges 0.85% per year while XAPR charges 0.85%. On a $10,000 position that is $85 vs $85 annually. On income, FOCT currently yields 0.00% against 0.00% for XAPR.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of FOCT and XAPR you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FOCT or XAPR?
FOCT has an expense ratio of 0.85% while XAPR charges 0.85%. At the precision these are quoted to, they cost the same.
Which performed better, FOCT or XAPR?
Over the past year FOCT returned +14.86% vs +8.17% for XAPR, so FOCT leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, FOCT or XAPR?
FOCT has been the more volatile fund at 7.5% annualized versus 2.4% for XAPR. Worst drawdown: FOCT -13.1% vs XAPR -6.2%.
Should I hold both FOCT and XAPR?
FOCT and XAPR have a monthly-return correlation of 0.42, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, FOCT or XAPR?
FOCT yields 0.00% while XAPR yields 0.00%, so XAPR currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is XAPR better than FOCT?
FOCT led over 1Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.