FPWR vs VTI
First Trust EIP Power Solutions ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, FPWR or VTI?
Mid Cap Value against Large Cap Blend.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 35.0%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FPWR | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.96% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $32M | $689.2B |
| Dividend Yield | 2.27% | 1.06% |
| Holdings | 58 | 3,524 |
| YTD Return | +8.51% | +13.48%Best |
| 1Y Return | +6.84% | +16.55%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +18.56% | +22.11%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +10.81% | +11.95%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 14.6%Best | 16.9% |
| Max Drawdown | -32.3%Best | -35.0% |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $16,707 | $17,584Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 35.0% | 33.5%Best |
| Fund Family | First Trust Portfolios (US) | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Mid Cap Value | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Aug 20, 2019 | May 24, 2001 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Aug 20, 2019 to Oct 15, 2026 (7.2 years).
FPWR vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 7.2 years both funds cover.
FPWR vs VTI Performance
First Trust EIP Power Solutions ETF (FPWR) is an ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US) and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year FPWR returned +6.84% while VTI returned +16.55%. Year to date, FPWR is up 8.51% versus a gain of 13.48% for VTI.
Over three years, FPWR compounded at +18.56% per year against +22.11% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +10.81% and +11.95% respectively. Across the full 7-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +15.29% annualized vs +10.24%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.9% compared with 14.6% for FPWR. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -32.3% for FPWR and -35.0% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.63. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FPWR charges 0.96% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $96 vs $3 annually, a gap of $93 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FPWR currently yields 2.27% against 1.06% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
76.6% of FPWR's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 2.5% of VTI's money is in holdings FPWR also owns.
Most of FPWR is already inside VTI. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
48 positions in common, counted across the 58 positions we hold weights for in FPWR and 3,441 in VTI, against full books of 58 and 3,524.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 1,110 positions for VTI that do not appear in our book for FPWR (95.1% of the fund), and 4 for FPWR that do not appear in VTI (15.5%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in FPWR | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NFGNational Fuel Gas Co | 3.62% | 0.01% | 3.61% |
| DUKDuke Energy Corp | 3.50% | 0.13% | 3.37% |
| PPLPpl Corp (Utilities) | 3.29% | 0.03% | 3.26% |
| KMIKinder Morgan Inc./de | 3.15% | 0.08% | 3.07% |
| WECWec Energy Group Inc. | 3.01% | 0.05% | 2.96% |
| SOSouthern Co. | 2.75% | 0.13% | 2.62% |
| IDAIdacorp Inc Ida | 2.85% | 0.01% | 2.84% |
| XELXcel Energy Inc. | 2.79% | 0.06% | 2.73% |
| CMSCms Energy Corp. | 2.79% | 0.03% | 2.76% |
| ETREntergy Corp. | 2.55% | 0.07% | 2.48% |
76.6% of FPWR is already inside VTI.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FPWR or VTI?
FPWR has an expense ratio of 0.96% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $93 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, FPWR or VTI?
Over the past year FPWR returned +6.84% vs +16.55% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (7 years), FPWR annualized +10.24% vs +15.29% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, FPWR or VTI?
VTI has been the more volatile fund at 16.9% annualized versus 14.6% for FPWR. Worst drawdown: FPWR -32.3% vs VTI -35.0%.
Should I hold both FPWR and VTI?
FPWR and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.63, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between FPWR and VTI?
76.6% of FPWR's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 2.5% of VTI's is in holdings FPWR also owns. They hold 48 positions in common, counted across the 58 positions we hold weights for in FPWR and 3,441 in VTI.
Which pays a higher dividend, FPWR or VTI?
FPWR yields 2.27% while VTI yields 1.06%, so FPWR currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than FPWR?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 35.0%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.